The U.S. Department of Defense Hit With $4.9B Lawsuit Over Data Breach

We haven’t published anything about the Defense Department for a while, the last news really was the whole RSA SecurID thing which affected some of the US DoD sub-contractors.

The latest news is they’ve been hit with a colossal lawsuit of almost $5 Billion! The lawsuit is regarding a recent breach involving a healthcare system for military personnel and their families.

It’s a pretty heavy suit, claiming $1000 for each of the 4.9 million people affected by the compromise.

The U.S. Department of Defense has been hit with a $4.9 billion lawsuit over a recently disclosed data breach involving TRICARE, a healthcare system for active and retired military personnel and their families.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington D.C. this week by four people whose data was allegedly compromised, seeks $1000 in damages for each of the 4.9 million individuals affected by the breach.

The suit charges TRICARE, the Department and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta with failing to adequately protect private data and of “intentional, willful and reckless disregard” for patient privacy rights.

TRICARE did not respond immediately to a request for comment. In the complaint, the four plaintiffs faulted TRICARE for failing to properly encrypt the private data in its possession and for taking too long to notify victims of the breach.

The four plaintiffs are Virginia Gaffney, a Hampton, Va.-based individual who described herself in court papers as the spouse of a decorated war veteran; her two children; and Adrienne Taylor, a Glendale, Az. Based Air Force veteran.

It’s an interesting culture the US has, people are always suing each other, bringing up lawsuits with ridiculous amounts and trying to get a free ride out of something that didn’t really affect them adversely.

Seriously, do you really think this data breach affected the plaintiff in any negative manner – I don’t see how it could of to be honest. Either way it’s an interesting case and it could potentially cost the already struggling US government a boatload of money.

TRICARE in September disclosed that sensitive data including Social Security Numbers, names, addresses, phone numbers and personal health data belonging to about 4.9 million active and retired U.S. military personnel may have been compromised after unencrypted backup tapes containing the data went missing.

The information on the tapes was from an electronic healthcare application used to capture patient data. The backup tapes were stolen from the car of an employee at Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC), a TRICARE contractor. The breach affects all those who received care at the military’s San Antonio area military treatment facilities between 1992 and Sept. 7. 2011.

Lawsuits such as this one have become increasingly common in the immediate aftermath of a major data breach.

Earlier this month, for instance, Stanford Hospital and Clinics was hit with a $20 million proposed class action lawsuit for a data breach involving a third-party contractor. And major breaches such as the ones at Heartland Payment Systems, TJX and Hannaford Bros. have all prompted their share of consumer lawsuits charging the companies with negligence, breach of contract and other charges.

In many cases, courts however have tended to dismiss lawsuits in data breach cases. Several courts have held that consumers cannot claim compensatory or punitive damages in data breach cases unless they can demonstrate that they have suffered actual monetary damage as the result of a breach.

The notion that someone might become the victim of ID theft in future because of a data breach cannot be used as a basis for claims, courts have held.

It’s a pretty huge breach seen as though the tapes stolen contained backups with 19 years of data on them, that’s a LOT of data. But then again, like I said above – they are unlikely to get anywhere with this as I don’t think they would have lost any money from this breach.

Once again it was due to a third party contractor being careless – as has been the case many times. And well in this case, if they do get hit with the lawsuit and need to pay out – they should pass it onto the contractor.

Source: Network World

Posted in: Legal Issues, Privacy


Latest Posts:

Socialscan - Command-Line Tool To Check For Email And Social Media Username Usage Socialscan – Command-Line Tool To Check For Email And Social Media Username Usage
socialscan is an accurate command-line tool to check For email and social media username usage on online platforms, given an email address or username,
CFRipper - CloudFormation Security Scanning & Audit Tool CFRipper – CloudFormation Security Scanning & Audit Tool
CFRipper is a Python-based Library and CLI security analyzer that functions as an AWS CloudFormation security scanning and audit tool
CredNinja - Test Credential Validity of Dumped Credentials or Hashes CredNinja – Test Credential Validity of Dumped Credentials or Hashes
CredNinja is a tool to quickly test credential validity of dumped credentials (or hashes) across an entire network or domain very efficiently.
assetfinder - Find Related Domains and Subdomains assetfinder – Find Related Domains and Subdomains
assetfinder is a Go-based tool to find related domains and subdomains that are related to a given domain from a variety of sources including Facebook and more.
Karkinos - Beginner Friendly Penetration Testing Tool Karkinos – Beginner Friendly Penetration Testing Tool
Karkinos is a light-weight Beginner Friendly Penetration Testing Tool, which is basically a 'Swiss Army Knife' for pen-testing and/or hacking CTF's.
Aclpwn.Py - Exploit ACL Based Privilege Escalation Paths in Active Directory Aclpwn.Py – Exploit ACL Based Privilege Escalation Paths in Active Directory is a tool that interacts with BloodHound< to identify and exploit ACL based privilege escalation paths.

5 Responses to The U.S. Department of Defense Hit With $4.9B Lawsuit Over Data Breach

  1. Bogwitch October 17, 2011 at 8:51 pm #

    I hear what you’re saying that the contractor is at least partly responsible for the breach but the fact that this quantity of data was being backed up with no apparent encryption means that the DoD was also responsible.
    I have written on my blog about NHS InfoSec being poor in the UK and the withdrawal of funding will exacerbate that immensely. I would be interested to see how the private sector in the UK performs. Unfortunately, the DPA does not have anywhere near the same teeth as HIPAA therefore the incentives to do information protection properly in the UK are greatly reduced.
    The great risk from this exposure is the medical information of current serving forces personnel could, if embarrassing, be used to blackmail for higher protectively marked information.

  2. Z October 17, 2011 at 9:18 pm #

    I believe you’re missing the point. The DOD has lost my data on numerous occasions. Some were large corporations, some educational institutions and persons I work with have emailed spreadsheets of personal data to mailing lists unintentionally. Some of the time we receive a notification and on one occasion I received a free years worth of credit reporting.

    The problem is that these companies and individuals have broken contractual and legal obligations to individuals. The unfortunate reality is that these companies and persons continue their work unabated. The only recourse as an individual is a lawsuit. The people outside of the DOD that were harmed by this should consider themselves lucky. Active military service members cannot take legal recourse with some of the parties involved.

    I used to be of the same mindset as you. That Americans were sue happy and that it was unbecoming. Unfortunately due to the way our legal system works lawsuits are the only way a victim is able to bring about justice. The Justice Department should be the ones taking them to court but because it was a large government organization and defense contractor that will never happen.


  3. ted October 18, 2011 at 4:05 am #

    The federal tort claims act allows monetary recovery against the United States for damages, loss of property, personal injury or death. In seeking recovery, one must show that the damages occurred as a result of the negligent or wrongful acts of government employees acting within the scope of their employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.

  4. Darknet October 20, 2011 at 2:26 pm #

    Good comments guys thanks, can’t say I’m super enlightened when it comes to the US law or cultures.

  5. Kelly Stevens November 13, 2011 at 8:36 pm #

    $1000 is about what it will cost for credit monitoring to assure the lost data isn’t being used. If it is used, the loss to the victim is much higher. How is the plaintiff not being harmed in ant way?