01 September 2008 | 3,505 views

UK Hacker Gary McKinnon Loses Appeal Against Extradition

Prevent Network Security Leaks with Acunetix

So the latest news with the Gary McKinnon case that was he was trying to fight against Extradition, he started off with Appeals against US Extradition, then he Won The Right to Lords Appeal Extradition Hearing and then he lost the Lords case then went for the European Court.

Sadly it seems he lost his appeal in the European Court of Human Rights and he is to face immediate extradition and trial in the US possibly still under charges of terrorism, which is ridiculous.

The British hacker facing extradition to the US for breaking into the computer systems of the Pentagon and NASA has lost his appeal with the European Court of Human Rights.

Gary McKinnon (42) was hoping to be tried in the UK where the alleged offences took place. The Glaswegian now faces immediate extradition for trial.

McKinnon lost an appeal in the House of Lords last month and applied to the European court for temporary relief on August 12. After yesterday’s verdict, that relief will no longer apply.

So the decision is out finally, after temporary relief until August 28th he was safe in the UK but now extradition has been granted he will be heading to the US.

I hope they don’t try and make an example of him because he doesn’t wish to comply with their wishes, apparently he has Asperger’s too (a form of autism).

He has previously declined a deal with the US authorities in which he would receive a shorter sentence in return for a guilty appeal. He now faces up to 60 years in prison although the sentence is likely to be much shorter.

McKinnon’s lawyers are now appealing to the home secretary to allow their client to be tried in the UK as he has recently been diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome.

McKinnon denies his activities were a threat to US security and claims he was then motivated by a belief that the computer systems contained information about UFOs that was being concealed from the public.

I really wonder what kind of sentence he will get, he surely won’t get the full 60 years terrorism sentence but still they could be harsh with him.

If I had to make a conservative guess I’d say 3-5 years in the clink, up to a maximum of about 7.

I really hope he doesn’t get that though and get’s 6-12 months in a low security facility.

Source: Tech Radar (Thanks Navin)



Recent in General Hacking:
- Dradis v2.9 – Information Sharing For Security Assessments
- MagicTree v1.3 Available For Download – Pentesting Productivity
- Kvasir – Penetration Testing Data Management Tool

Related Posts:
- Gary McKinnon Wins Right to Appeal Against Extradition
- Pentagon Hacker Gary McKinnon Appeals against US Extradition
- NASA Hacker Gary McKinnon Wins Right to Lords Appeal Extradition Hearing

Most Read in General Hacking:
- 10 Best Security Live CD Distros (Pen-Test, Forensics & Recovery) - 1,137,265 views
- Hack Tools/Exploits - 581,130 views
- Password Cracking with Rainbowcrack and Rainbow Tables - 414,134 views

Advertise on Darknet

11 Responses to “UK Hacker Gary McKinnon Loses Appeal Against Extradition”

  1. Flux 1 September 2008 at 10:19 pm Permalink

    If he is convicted in the US is it likely he would be able to serve his sentence in the UK?

  2. Morgan Storey 1 September 2008 at 10:43 pm Permalink

    No the USA have already made it pretty clear he is going to serve in the USA. His maximum sentance from what I have read is 10 years per “terrorist offence”, he installed software on about 200 computers… So again we someone who did something rather minor being put away for a long time when mass-murders and rapists get less time in prison.
    He has already had 4 years of basically home detention, I think that should be taken into account and he get a suspended sentance.
    But a suspended sentace is wishful thinking, they will want to make an example of him, so I agree with you Darknet he will probably get 3-7.

  3. smashie 2 September 2008 at 5:46 am Permalink

    Given how rabid the prosecutor seemed to be, I think they are going to try for a much longer sentence. It’s a big PR deal for them now.

  4. d347hm4n 2 September 2008 at 8:22 am Permalink

    They will make an example of him, because they can’t make an example out of all of the Chinese and Russian hackers that penetrate their systems regularly with ease….

  5. Pantagruel 2 September 2008 at 8:52 am Permalink

    I’m afraid that the prosecution will use this scape goat to the max of their possibilities. Like d347hm4n says, this is the next best thing since they will never get their hands on a Chinese or Russian hacker.

    Like Darknet mentions, his reluctance to be forthcoming will be used against him and his Asperger’s syndrome most likely explained as ‘dangerous’ compulsive behavior.

    I do not condone hacking but it’s clear this particular case should be examined more closely regarding instead of turning it into a road show.

  6. Donna 2 September 2008 at 2:46 pm Permalink

    This upsets me to no end on how our government can do this. How is this classified as terrorism? This is just a harmless hack which doesn’t deserve that term. He will be made an example of that’s for sure. They should be hiring him if anything to fix our shitty security.

  7. blah 2 September 2008 at 9:04 pm Permalink

    7 years max? where are you pulling that number from? You have consider the amount of cleanup necessary to undo the damage he did. He will likely get much more time unless he takes them up on another offer.

  8. Morgan Storey 2 September 2008 at 11:07 pm Permalink

    @blah: I didn’t say 7 years max, I said around 7 years. I don’t think they will go for much more especially because he would be a fool to plead innocent. I think they will try and make an example of him, but at the same time try to not be overly offensive to the UK which they need to keep on side or their “war on terror” will go south more than it has.
    The amount of cleanup they had to do, wouldn’t be much, you can just push out a script to uninstall the software and change the administrator username and (set a) password.
    It would take me about an hour, and I think there would be smarter people that me at NASA… Then again spyware on the ISS doesn’t speak volumes for their IT literacy.

  9. Flux 3 September 2008 at 4:28 am Permalink

    Personally I think this highlights how the most recent anti-terrorism laws can be twisted to prosecute nearly any person on trial. Just because he supposedly hacked secure servers does not mean he is a terrorist. I cant really see him getting anything near 60 years though, how is that consistent with time for violent crimes? I do agree that the US want to make an example of him more then anything else so he will certainly be serving some time.

    Also, I wouldn’t want to serve jail time in the US. I hear the prisons over there are meant to be quite rough! Seems unfair that a UK citizen cant serve time in the jails he paid taxes for.

  10. Navin 4 September 2008 at 2:15 pm Permalink

    Firstly Cheers :)
    Secondly, i do agree with flux on the fact tht nowadays rules can be bent to prosecute anyone as per the needs…the Mc Kinnon case has been blown so much outta proportion that in order to maintain the status of the judicial system, he’ll have to go to the slammer for more than what would be expected if the case was kept intenal

  11. brian 6 September 2008 at 6:55 pm Permalink

    What pisses me off more than anything else, is the little support Gary has received from CERTAIN quarters. There you have Judges, who never been near a computer in their lives, passing judgements six years after the event, that can ruin peoples lives.
    If every Hacker was doing as much damage as Gary did, then Hackers should be proclaimed as ANGELS.
    From Now on, run the script……….that deletes the hard drive clean(including the OS) and exit………using a $25 wireless lap top hooked on un-secure connection wherever you can find one……..and then throw the lap top away.
    Revenge is sweet, and some one has to do the dirty work, or do the lecturing.