{"id":4429,"date":"2017-02-15T22:08:14","date_gmt":"2017-02-15T14:08:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/?p=4429"},"modified":"2017-02-15T22:08:37","modified_gmt":"2017-02-15T14:08:37","slug":"why-are-hackers-winning-the-security-game","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/2017\/02\/why-are-hackers-winning-the-security-game\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Are Hackers Winning The Security Game?"},"content":{"rendered":"

A lot of people and companies get complacent and don’t believe the hackers are winning, but trust me they are. So we have to ask, why are hackers winning the security game? What’s putting them ahead of the security teams and CISOs inside organizations.<\/p>\n

\"Why<\/p>\n

It’s an old story anyway, the Hackers always win in some way or another as they have less to lose (unless they get arrested, which is rare) they have more angles to attack, they can use more methods\/tools\/vectors and have no limits on how far they can go to get what they want (especially for high value targets).<\/p>\n

Comfortable illusions about how security is working are crippling the ability of government and industry to fight the threat, a former member of the FBI\u2019s netsec team has told the BSides San Francisco 2017 security conference.<\/p>\n

Society is operating under the illusion that governments and corporations are taking rational choices about computer security, but the fact of the matter is that we\u2019re drowning under a sea of false positive, bad management, and a false belief in the power of technology to save us.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe government is very reactive,\u201d said Jason Truppi, director of endpoint detection and response at security firm Tanium and a former FBI investigator. \u201cOver time we\u2019ve learned it wasn\u2019t working – just being reactive, not proactive.\u201d<\/p>\n

Truppi said we need to puncture the belief that government and industry are working together to solve online threats. In reality, he says, the commercial sector and government are working to very different agendas and the result is a hopeless mishmash of confusing loyalties.<\/p>\n

On threat intelligence sharing, for example, the government encourages business to share news of vulnerabilities. But the subsequent investigations can be wide-ranging and lead to business’ people being charged for unrelated matters. A result companies are increasingly unwilling to share data if it exposes them to wider risks.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n