{"id":4350,"date":"2016-12-01T16:29:24","date_gmt":"2016-12-01T08:29:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/?p=4350"},"modified":"2016-12-01T16:29:36","modified_gmt":"2016-12-01T08:29:36","slug":"uk-encryption-backdoor-law-passed-via-investigatory-powers-act","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/2016\/12\/uk-encryption-backdoor-law-passed-via-investigatory-powers-act\/","title":{"rendered":"UK Encryption Backdoor Law Passed Via Investigatory Powers Act"},"content":{"rendered":"

The latest news out of my homeland is not good, the UK encryption backdoor law passed via Investigatory Powers Act or the IPA Bill as it’s commonly known. And itself was passed through a kind of backdoor route, which avoided the scorn of the public.<\/p>\n

\"UK<\/p>\n

Which was good for the lawmakers, but not for the citizens as with the case of the Burr-Feinstein Bill<\/a> proposed in the US which was turned around by a huge backlash.<\/p>\n

Among the many unpleasant things in the Investigatory Powers Act that was officially signed into law this week, one that has not gained as much attention is the apparent ability for the UK government to undermine encryption and demand surveillance backdoors.<\/p>\n

As the bill was passing through Parliament, several organizations noted their alarm at section 217 which obliged ISPs, telcos and other communications providers to let the government know in advance of any new products and services being deployed and allow the government to demand “technical” changes to software and systems.<\/p>\n

As per the final wording of the law, comms providers on the receiving end of a “technical capacity notice” will be obliged to do various things on demand for government snoops \u2013 such as disclosing details of any system upgrades and removing “electronic protection” on encrypted communications.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n