{"id":4095,"date":"2016-03-03T03:11:22","date_gmt":"2016-03-02T19:11:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/?p=4095"},"modified":"2016-03-03T12:58:24","modified_gmt":"2016-03-03T04:58:24","slug":"drown-openssl-attack-need-know","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/2016\/03\/drown-openssl-attack-need-know\/","title":{"rendered":"DROWN Attack on TLS &#8211; Everything You Need To Know"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So SSL in general is having a rough time lately, now with the SSLv2 DROWN attack on TLS. And this is not long after <a href=\"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/2015\/05\/the-logjam-attack-another-critical-tls-weakness\/\">Logjam<\/a> and a while since <a href=\"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/2014\/04\/heartbleed-bug-ssl-vulnerability-everything-need-know\/\">Heartbleed<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/2014\/10\/everything-need-know-poodle-sslv3-vulnerability\/\">POODLE<\/a> and FREAK.<\/p>\n<p>DROWN is a cross-protocol attack that can decrypt passively collected TLS sessions from up-to-date clients and stands for <strong>D<\/strong>ecrypting <strong>R<\/strong>SA with <strong>O<\/strong>bsolete and <strong>W<\/strong>eakened e<strong>N<\/strong>cryption.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/2016-03-03-02_11_18-DROWN-Attack-640x398.png\" alt=\"DROWN Attack\" width=\"640\" height=\"398\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4096\" \/><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>DROWN is a serious vulnerability that affects HTTPS and other services that rely on SSL and TLS, some of the essential cryptographic protocols for Internet security. These protocols allow everyone on the Internet to browse the web, use email, shop online, and send instant messages without third-parties being able to read the communication.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The full technical paper is available here: <a href=\"https:\/\/drownattack.com\/drown-attack-paper.pdf\">drown-attack-paper.pdf<\/a> [PDF]<\/p>\n<p>In some ways this is just a new, improved, stronger version of the earlier Bleichenbacher attack.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A typical scenario requires the attacker to observe 1,000 TLS handshakes, then initiate 40,000 SSLv2 connections and perform 2<sup>50<\/sup> offline work to decrypt a 2048-bit RSA TLS cipher-text.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If any other server uses the same private key and allows SSLv2 connections, even for completely different protocol, you could be vulnerable. Many companies reuse the same certificate and key on their web and email servers, for instance. In this case, if the email server supports SSLv2 and the web server does not, an attacker can take advantage of the email server to break TLS connections to the web server.<\/p>\n<p>Ouch.<\/p>\n<script async src=\"https:\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js?client=ca-pub-3033787195489589\"\r\n     crossorigin=\"anonymous\"><\/script>\r\n<!-- Darknet Responsive Post Ad Links [previously link ad unit] -->\r\n<ins class=\"adsbygoogle\"\r\n     style=\"display:block\"\r\n     data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-3033787195489589\"\r\n     data-ad-slot=\"5456620019\"\r\n     data-ad-format=\"auto\"><\/ins>\r\n<script>\r\n     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});\r\n<\/script>\n<p>In a worst case scenario and with adequate processing power, this could mean a real time man-in-the-middle attack is possible.<\/p>\n<h3>Am I vulnerable?<\/h3>\n<p>If you have any servers, anywhere with SSLv2 enabled &#8211; then yes. If you share private keys (that includes with a CDN provider, mail server, DNS server etc) you could be in worse trouble. Even if your web server doesn&#8217;t have SSLv2 enabled, you are still vulnerable.<\/p>\n<h3>How do I protect myself<\/h3>\n<p>For most of Linux bods, OpenSSL already released a patched version of their library last Tuesday &#8211; if you haven&#8217;t already installed it please do so ASAP.<\/p>\n<p>On Ubuntu it\u2019s as simple as doing aptitude update; aptitude safe-upgrade -y; and then restarting all relevant services, or simply rebooting.<\/p>\n<p>Check your OpenSSL build date &#8211; it should be February 29th for you to be safe:<\/p>\n<pre>openssl version -a<\/pre>\n<p>For nginx, newer versions disable SSLv2 by defauly anyway, but if you want to be sure use the following:<\/p>\n<pre>ssl_protocols TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2<\/pre>\n<p>And for Apache:<\/p>\n<pre>SSLProtocol All -SSLv2 -SSLv3<\/pre>\n<p>So go and patch, and if you&#8217;re not sure about the implications of this attack I suggest regenerating your private keys, regenerate new SSL certs and install those after patching and blocking SSLv2 from all your services.<\/p>\n<p>The official site for the attack can be found here: <a href=\"https:\/\/drownattack.com\/\">https:\/\/drownattack.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n<h3>More Reading<\/h3>\n<p>&#8211; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reddit.com\/r\/netsec\/comments\/48gce1\/the_drown_attack\/\">Reddit: The DROWN Attack<\/a><br \/>\n&#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theregister.co.uk\/2016\/03\/01\/drown_tls_protocol_flaw\/\">One-third of all HTTPS websites open to DROWN attack<\/a><br \/>\n&#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eweek.com\/security\/drown-vulnerability-hits-ssltls-but-its-no-heartbleed.html\">DROWN Vulnerability Hits SSL\/TLS, but It&#8217;s No Heartbleed<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So SSL in general is having a rough time lately, now with the SSLv2 DROWN attack on TLS. And this is not long after Logjam and a while since Heartbleed, POODLE and FREAK. DROWN is a cross-protocol attack that can decrypt passively collected TLS sessions from up-to-date clients and stands for Decrypting RSA with Obsolete [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":25,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"","_seopress_titles_title":"","_seopress_titles_desc":"So SSL in general is having a rough time lately, now with the SSLv2 DROWN attack on TLS. And this is not long after Logjam and a bunch of other flaws.","_seopress_robots_index":"","_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[26,10],"tags":[4928,8693],"featured_image_src":null,"featured_image_src_square":null,"author_info":{"display_name":"Darknet","author_link":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/author\/darknet\/"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4095"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/25"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4095"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4095\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4095"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.darknet.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}