The big news that has been blowing up in the past week or so is about a relatively unknown school district in Pennsylvania, US that has been spying on its students using Macbook webcams.
It has actually turned into a class action lawsuit and there is a lot of debate surrounding the story, the school claims they were using the software and ‘spycam’ functionality simply to recover lost laptops rather than actually spying on their students remotely.
The lawsuit deals with the issue of unauthorised access to the webcams and the actions could also possibly violate wiretapping laws. The lawsuit itself can be found here [PDF].
A suburban Philadelphia school district accused of secretly switching on laptop computer webcams inside students’ homes says it never used webcam images to monitor or discipline students and believes one of its administrators has been “unfairly portrayed and unjustly attacked.”
The Lower Merion School District, in response to a suit filed by a student, has acknowledged that webcams were remotely activated 42 times in the past 14 months, but only to find missing, lost or stolen laptops — which the district noted would include “a loaner computer that, against regulations, might be taken off campus.”
“Despite some reports to the contrary, be assured that the security-tracking software has been completely disabled,” Superintendent Christopher W. McGinley said in a statement on the district’s Web site late Friday. Officials vowed a comprehensive review that McGinley said should result in stronger privacy policies.
Harriton High School student Blake Robbins and his parents, Michael and Holly Robbins, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit Tuesday against the district, its board of directors and McGinley. They accused the school of turning on the webcam in his computer while it was inside their Penn Valley home, which they allege violated wiretap laws and his right to privacy.
It’s turning into a massive case and is generating press all over the globe, someone powerful technology was used by a perhaps over-zealous network admin named Mike Perbix.
You can also check out this very well-written and researched post on the technologies and methods used here: The Spy at Harriton High
There are people on all sides of the fence in this case, I personally think it was an interesting and effective use of technology but definitely should not have been implemented without disclosure. If you want to officially spy on people for theft prevention or asset tracking you should forewarn them.
The suit, which seeks class-action status, alleges that Harriton vice principal Lindy Matsko on Nov. 11 cited a laptop photo in telling Blake that the school thought he was engaging in improper behavior. He and his family have told reporters that an official mistook a piece of candy for a pill and thought he was selling drugs.
Neither the family nor their attorney, Mark Haltzman, returned calls this week seeking comment. A listed number for Matsko could not be found.
“We believe that the administrator at Harriton has been unfairly portrayed and unjustly attacked in connection with her attempts to be supportive of a student and his family,” the statement on the Lower Merion School District site said. “The district never did and never would use such tactics as a basis for disciplinary action.”
A district spokesman declined further comment on the statement Saturday.
Lower Merion, an affluent district in Philadelphia’s suburbs, issues Apple laptops to all 2,300 students at its two high schools. Only two employees in the technology department, not administrators, were authorized to activate the cameras, which captured still images but not sound, officials said.
“While certain rules for laptop use were spelled out … there was no explicit notification that the laptop contained the security software,” McGinley said. “This notice should have been given, and we regret that was not done.”
There is a plethora of information about this online including testimonies from current students, previous students and parents of both.
Many students suspected they were being spied on and taped up the cameras, wisely so it seems. But for the average computer using teenager if the school network admin tells them the green light next to the camera blinking now and then is a glitch they are going to believe it.
That right there is lying and makes the whole thing horribly suspicious, surely you only have the right to spy on kids if you have their parents consent..and even then it’s still a bit shady.
Either way this is a morally, legally and technically interesting case and I’m sure it’ll be heating up even more before it blows over.
Source: Yahoo! News