New Windows XP & Vista Full Take-over Hack with Firewire


This Firewire hack seems to be creating a big buzz, from what I’ve read it also works on Vista as for some odd reason the Firewire port gets access to the whole memory space in DMA mode – not just what it needs to function – so you can read from anything stored in memory with the right tools.

Pretty worrying eh? There is a few ways to secure yourself if you feel this is a threat (Disable the 1394 bus or disable DMA).

A security consultant based in New Zealand has released a tool that can unlock Windows computers in seconds without the need for a password.

Adam Boileau first demonstrated the hack, which affects Windows XP computers but has not yet been tested with Windows Vista, at a security conference in Sydney in 2006, but Microsoft has yet to develop a fix.

Interviewed in ITRadio’s Risky Business podcast, Boileau said the tool, released to the public today, could “unlock locked Windows machines or login without a password … merely by plugging in your Firewire cable and running a command”.

If you are interested in the details and want to read about the Windows Vista Firewire hack you can do so here [PDF].

As I’ve always said though, if you have physical access you basically own the machine. Physical security of servers is a lot more important than many people think.

To use the tool, hackers must connect a Linux-based computer to a Firewire port on the target machine. The machine is then tricked into allowing the attacking computer to have read and write access to its memory.

With full access to the memory, the tool can then modify Windows’ password protection code, which is stored there, and render it ineffective.

Older desktop computers do not come equipped with Firewire ports, which are needed for the hack to work, but many recent models do. Most laptops made in the last few years include Firewire ports.

Microsoft has been unavailable for comment about this issue of course. The FD thread is extremely long, if you are interested in reading it you can do so here.

Source: Sydney Morning Herald

Posted in: Exploits/Vulnerabilities, Windows Hacking

, , ,


Latest Posts:


Sooty - SOC Analyst All-In-One CLI Tool Sooty – SOC Analyst All-In-One CLI Tool
Sooty is a tool developed with the task of aiding a SOC analyst to automate parts of their workflow and speed up their process.
UBoat - Proof Of Concept PoC HTTP Botnet Project UBoat – Proof Of Concept PoC HTTP Botnet Project
UBoat is a PoC HTTP Botnet designed to replicate a full weaponised commercial botnet like the famous large scale infectors Festi, Grum, Zeus and SpyEye.
LambdaGuard - AWS Lambda Serverless Security Scanner LambdaGuard – AWS Lambda Serverless Security Scanner
LambdaGuard is a tool which allows you to visualise and audit the security of your serverless assets, an open-source AWS Lambda Serverless Security Scanner.
exe2powershell - Convert EXE to BAT Files exe2powershell – Convert EXE to BAT Files
exe2powershell is used to convert EXE to BAT files, the previously well known tool for this was exe2bat, this is a version for modern Windows.
HiddenWall - Create Hidden Kernel Modules HiddenWall – Create Hidden Kernel Modules
HiddenWall is a Linux kernel module generator used to create hidden kernel modules to protect your server from attackers.
Anteater - CI/CD Security Gate Check Framework Anteater – CI/CD Security Gate Check Framework
Anteater is a CI/CD Security Gate Check Framework to prevent the unwanted merging of filenames, binaries, deprecated functions, staging variables and more.


7 Responses to New Windows XP & Vista Full Take-over Hack with Firewire

  1. Bogwitch March 21, 2008 at 11:05 am #

    It’s not just MS OSes that are vulnerable to this – anything with an active firewire.
    The reason it can access the memory direclty is that Firewire is a BUS whereas USB etc. is a PORT.

  2. Pantagruel March 21, 2008 at 1:24 pm #

    A fun thing to read.

    Like Bogwitch says, it’s a bus and has direct DMA access, basically needed since most of the firewire attached stuf is a HDD or other drive which want/need DMA access. Did a trial with disabled DMA but trying to capture video from the firewire attached hi-8 cam results in significant more frame loss compared to having DMA turned on. The direct DMA access appears to be needed to ensure a proper dump of the data coming in at the firewire onto the hdd (both p-ATA and s-ATA are fast enough to capture the 4 Mb datastream).

    @Darknet, indeed a makeshift secured broom cupboard (padlock/etc and steel plate reinforced door) is enough to keep out the average purp.

  3. James C March 21, 2008 at 2:40 pm #

    @Darknet
    “As I

  4. zupakomputer March 21, 2008 at 3:30 pm #

    Have to agree too – the ways of taking over a machine are plentiful if you have physical access to it.

  5. fever April 10, 2008 at 4:43 pm #

    another example of disable that which you do not use. Or it will come to bite you in the end.

  6. Clarkson January 5, 2009 at 8:32 pm #

    Just pick up the machine and walk out with it, if you have physical access to the box.

  7. Bogwitch January 5, 2009 at 10:52 pm #

    Clarkson,

    The attack mentioned does have some practical application.
    Imagine a workstation with full disk encryption. Having physical access to the workstation is not much use. Now, if the workstation is powered, but locked, the attacker can gain access to the OS using this method.