IBM Accused of Hacking


This is actually a very important case depending on which way it goes.

It could become a landmark case in regards to liability for machines on your network, or actually any traffic originating from your IP range.

A boutique Washington, D.C.-based law firm is accusing IBM of hacking into its e-mail system and is seeking recourse.

The firm, Butera & Andrews, filed suit against IBM and is seeking unspecified damages and repayment of more than $61,000 that it paid to investigate the alleged break-in and repair its e-mail system, according to a copy of the suit, which was filed in April in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

IBM of course wants to dismiss the case stating it’s not their liability.

IBM has since filed papers with the court seeking to dismiss the case, arguing that the law firm failed to state a legitimate claim. Butera & Andrews, meanwhile, have asked the court for limited discovery, allowing it to investigate the matter, which IBM opposes, according to recently filed court papers.

Butera & Andrews charge that an unnamed IBM employee at a Durham, N.C., hacked into its e-mail system. The individual allegedly broke into the system, gained full privileges and was able to download messages at will, according to the complaint.

The firm hired outside experts after it “became aware of facts which suggested that the e-mail server through which the firm operated had been compromised by unauthorized parties” in November 2005, according to the complaint.

It seems like an awful lot of attempts, but really can IBM be held liable? In a way I hope not as it could tide badly for everything if they are made responsible for the activity on all IP addresses registered to them.

The investigation turned up more than 42,000 attempts from over 80 different Internet protocol addresses owned by IBM to acces the Butera & Andrews e-mail system last year, the complaint said.

“Plaintiff cannot state a claim merely by alleging that certain events are ‘tied’ to IP addresses registered to IBM,” the Armonk, N.Y., IT giant said in a court filing on June 30. “Indeed, plaintiff’s argument would be akin to holding AOL liable for intentional misconduct any time an IP address registered to AOL.”

It’s an accurate comparison IMHO.

Source: News.com

Posted in: Legal Issues, Networking Hacking

, ,


Latest Posts:


zBang - Privileged Account Threat Detection Tool zBang – Privileged Account Threat Detection Tool
zBang is a risk assessment tool for Privileged Account Threat Detection on a scanned network, organizations & red teams can use it to identify attack vectors
Memhunter - Automated Memory Resident Malware Detection Memhunter – Automated Memory Resident Malware Detection
Memhunter is an Automated Memory Resident Malware Detection tool for the hunting of memory resident malware at scale, improving threat hunter analysis process.
Sandcastle - AWS S3 Bucket Enumeration Tool Sandcastle – AWS S3 Bucket Enumeration Tool
Sandcastle is an Amazon AWS S3 Bucket Enumeration Tool, formerly known as bucketCrawler. The script takes a target's name as the stem argument (e.g. shopify).
Astra - API Automated Security Testing For REST Astra – API Automated Security Testing For REST
Astra is a Python-based tool for API Automated Security Testing, REST API penetration testing is complex due to continuous changes in existing APIs.
Judas DNS - Nameserver DNS Poisoning Attack Tool Judas DNS – Nameserver DNS Poisoning Attack Tool
Judas DNS is a Nameserver DNS Poisoning Attack Tool which functions as a DNS proxy server built to be deployed in place of a taken over nameserver to perform targeted exploitation.
dsniff Download - Tools for Network Auditing & Password Sniffing dsniff Download – Tools for Network Auditing & Password Sniffing
Dsniff download is a collection of tools for network auditing & penetration testing. Dsniff, filesnarf, mailsnarf, msgsnarf, URLsnarf, and WebSpy passively monitor a network


Comments are closed.