<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Darknet - The Darkside &#187; deep packet inspection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/deep-packet-inspection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:34:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UK ISP TalkTalk Monitoring Users Without Consent (Deep Packet Inspection)</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/07/uk-isp-talktalk-monitoring-users-without-consent-deep-packet-inspection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/07/uk-isp-talktalk-monitoring-users-without-consent-deep-packet-inspection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darknet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep packet inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp monitoring users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isp snooping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talktalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk isp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk talktalk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=2919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well this can be looked at in a number of ways, many would say &#8220;If you&#8217;ve nothing to hide, why worry?&#8221; &#8211; but then we know people in the UK can be fairly fanatical when it comes to issues regarding privacy. Also TalkTalk are claiming it&#8217;s an anonymous system, so actual user details aren&#8217;t stored. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Well this can be looked at in a number of ways, many would say &#8220;If you&#8217;ve nothing to hide, why worry?&#8221; &#8211; but then we know people in the UK can be fairly fanatical when it comes to issues regarding privacy. Also TalkTalk are claiming it&#8217;s an anonymous system, so actual user details aren&#8217;t stored.</p>
<p>Either way it&#8217;s a bit shady doing this kind of monitoring without even notifying your users and not offering any way of opting out from the exercise.</p>
<p>Plus the fact is, most of the major browsers already have this kind of technology built in and so does Google if people rely on it as their main search engine. It reminds me a little of the recent article <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/06/australians-propose-no-anti-virus-no-internet-connection-policy/">Australians Propose ‘No Anti-virus – No Internet Connection’ Policy</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Broadband ISP TalkTalk  UK could be about to incur the wrath of privacy campaigners after some of its customers spotted that their online website browsing activity was being monitored and recorded without consent. The situation has caused a significant amount of concern with many end-users worried about the impact upon their personal privacy.</p>
<p>TalkTalk has since confirmed that the monitoring, which was first discovered on the ISPs discussion forum during the middle of July (<a href="http://www.talktalkmembers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=46287">here</a>), is part of a future Malware/Security/Parental Guidance tool to be provided by Chinese vendor Huawei. This is due to launch before the end of 2010.</p>
<p>The system, which is not yet fully in place, aims to help block dangerous websites (e.g. those designed to spread malware) by comparing the URL that a person visits against a list of good and bad/dangerous sites. Bad sites will then be restricted.</p></blockquote>
<p>Apparently the system itself will be opt-in, but from what is happening now it&#8217;s likely the data collection will still be carried out across the whole customer-base.</p>
<p>Also under the Data Protection act they are operating in a legal grey area and the new Digital Economy Act 2010. I honestly don&#8217;t think such a service is required and already duplicates the functionality that people already have.</p>
<blockquote><p>At present the affected customers cannot opt-out of TalkTalk&#8217;s data collection exercise, while the actual malware/block tool itself has yet to be enabled and will also be subjected to optional customer testing before it is. The resulting system will apparently only be available if you opt-in to use it.</p>
<p>As a result the systems first stage is currently just monitoring and recording URLs, which TalkTalk says is an anonymous process; no end-user IP address or personal details are revealed. However some customer posts have suggested that the TalkTalk system also reads the code for sites, at least the ones it cannot identify, which could in theory pose a security risk if the URL you visited was for a private admin page. Some of these would be pages that even Google cannot find.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth pointing out that ISPs are already required to record website and email accesses (but not content), including dates and times, as part of the previous governments Data Retention Directive. However this is a closed process for use by specific public/security services and should not be confused with what TalkTalk is doing.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gotta give TalkTalk kudos for owning up to it though, explaining their actions and not trying to sweep it under the carpet. I wonder how they will address it going forwards though and if any legal cases will arise from this.</p>
<p>The conspiracy theorists will also say that the technology vendor is linked to the Chinese PLA and this data could be used for espionage purposes!</p>
<p></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2010/07/26/uk-isp-talktalk-monitoring-its-customers-online-activity-without-consent.html">ISP Review</a></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=UK+ISP+TalkTalk+Monitoring+Users+Without+Consent+%28Deep+Packet+Inspection%29+http%3A%2F%2Fdarknet.org.uk%2F%3Fp%3D2919+from+%40THEdarknet" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/07/uk-isp-talktalk-monitoring-users-without-consent-deep-packet-inspection/&amp;t=UK+ISP+TalkTalk+Monitoring+Users+Without+Consent+%28Deep+Packet+Inspection%29" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/facebook/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/07/uk-isp-talktalk-monitoring-users-without-consent-deep-packet-inspection/&amp;imageurl=" title="Post to Google Buzz"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/gbuzz/tt-gbuzz-micro3.png" alt="Post to Google Buzz" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/07/uk-isp-talktalk-monitoring-users-without-consent-deep-packet-inspection/&amp;title=UK+ISP+TalkTalk+Monitoring+Users+Without+Consent+%28Deep+Packet+Inspection%29" title="Post to Delicious"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/delicious/tt-delicious-micro3.png" alt="Post to Delicious" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/07/uk-isp-talktalk-monitoring-users-without-consent-deep-packet-inspection/&amp;title=UK+ISP+TalkTalk+Monitoring+Users+Without+Consent+%28Deep+Packet+Inspection%29" title="Post to Digg"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/digg/tt-digg-micro3.png" alt="Post to Digg" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/07/uk-isp-talktalk-monitoring-users-without-consent-deep-packet-inspection/&amp;title=UK+ISP+TalkTalk+Monitoring+Users+Without+Consent+%28Deep+Packet+Inspection%29" title="Post to Reddit"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/reddit/tt-reddit-micro3.png" alt="Post to Reddit" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/07/uk-isp-talktalk-monitoring-users-without-consent-deep-packet-inspection/&amp;title=UK+ISP+TalkTalk+Monitoring+Users+Without+Consent+%28Deep+Packet+Inspection%29" title="Post to StumbleUpon"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/su/tt-su-micro3.png" alt="Post to StumbleUpon" /></a></p></div><div class="AWD_like_button "><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.darknet.org.uk%2F2010%2F07%2Fuk-isp-talktalk-monitoring-users-without-consent-deep-packet-inspection%2F&amp;send=false&amp;layout=standard&amp;width=&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=40" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:px; height:40px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/07/uk-isp-talktalk-monitoring-users-without-consent-deep-packet-inspection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deep Packet Inspection Engine Goes Open Source</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/10/deep-packet-inspection-engine-goes-open-source/</link>
		<comments>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/10/deep-packet-inspection-engine-goes-open-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darknet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Countermeasures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep packet inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipoque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source deep packet inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source packet inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opendpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packet inspection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=2109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is great news, especially for open source tool developers. Deep packet inspection is an extremely niche area and requires great expertise (and a lot of R&#038;D of course). I hope a new project can spawn from this, it has many interesting applications. I think it&#8217;d be a good addition to Wireshark and IDS projects [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>This is great news, especially for open source tool developers. Deep packet inspection is an extremely niche area and requires great expertise (and a lot of R&#038;D of course).</p>
<p>I hope a new project can spawn from this, it has many interesting applications. I think it&#8217;d be a good addition to Wireshark and IDS projects like Snort.</p>
<p><a href="http://opendpi.org/">http://opendpi.org/</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Deep packet inspection (DPI) hardware can identify an astonishing array of protocols passing across the Internet—up to and including protocols that are rare even to us in the Orbiting HQ (Gadu-Gadu? Manolito? Feidian?). But if you&#8217;ve ever wondered just how this can be done, and done at wire speed, wonder no more: Europe&#8217;s leading DPI vendor has open-sourced a version of its traffic detection engine.</p>
<p>OpenDPI.org is the new home for ipoque&#8217;s open source project; anyone interested can take a look at the code or contribute patches. The goal in this case, though, isn&#8217;t so much about crowdsourcing product development but about easing consumer fears about DPI technology.</p>
<p>Klaus Mochalski, CEO of ipoque, explains that &#8220;transparency was important for us from the beginning. The lack of transparency from the vendors&#8217; side is widespread in the DPI business. Our thoughts are a bit different and that is why we decided to push this project.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It can identify a whole range of weird and wonderful protocols including those you&#8217;ve never heard of. </p>
<p>The free version is basically a watered down of the commercial product, it&#8217;s slow, doesn&#8217;t come bundled with some fancy supercomputer grade hardware and can&#8217;t handle encrypted transmissions.</p>
<p>I think it will be useful too for people building open source router systems to manage traffic, do traffic shaping and general QoS with much more accuracy (rather than relying on port classification).</p>
<blockquote><p>The OpenDPI engine, released under the LGPL license, differs from ipoque&#8217;s commercial scanning engine in its high-priced DPI hardware. The open-source version is much slower and (more importantly) doesn&#8217;t reveal ipoque&#8217;s methods for identifying encrypted transmissions. DPI vendors all claim high levels of success at identifying such traffic based on the flow patterns and handshake signatures common to protocols like BitTorrent and Skype, even if they cannot crack the encryption and examine the content of those transmissions.</p>
<p>ipoque apparently wants to convince people that its detection code doesn&#8217;t store or examine the actual content being transmitted. The company made the same point in a white paper released last week. &#8220;DPI as such has no negative impact on online privacy,&#8221; it says. &#8220;It is, again, only the applications that may have this impact. Prohibiting DPI as a technology would be just as naive as prohibiting automatic speech recognition because it can be used to eavesdrop on conversations based on content.</p>
<p>Although DPI can be used as a base technology to look at and evaluate the actual content of a network communication, this goes beyond what we understand as DPI as it is used by Internet bandwidth management—the classification of network protocols and applications.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I hope they keep developing the project, or some other folks in the Open Source community step up and turn it into a full blown development fork.</p>
<p>That would be great, harness the existing technology and improve on it.</p>
<p>Because let&#8217;s face it, any commercial company releasing an Open Source branch of their software has no incentive to make it that great lest it get better than the stuff they are selling.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/09/deep-packet-inspection-engine-goes-open-source.ars">Ars Technica</a></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Deep+Packet+Inspection+Engine+Goes+Open+Source+http%3A%2F%2Fdarknet.org.uk%2F%3Fp%3D2109+from+%40THEdarknet" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/10/deep-packet-inspection-engine-goes-open-source/&amp;t=Deep+Packet+Inspection+Engine+Goes+Open+Source" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/facebook/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/10/deep-packet-inspection-engine-goes-open-source/&amp;imageurl=" title="Post to Google Buzz"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/gbuzz/tt-gbuzz-micro3.png" alt="Post to Google Buzz" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/10/deep-packet-inspection-engine-goes-open-source/&amp;title=Deep+Packet+Inspection+Engine+Goes+Open+Source" title="Post to Delicious"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/delicious/tt-delicious-micro3.png" alt="Post to Delicious" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/10/deep-packet-inspection-engine-goes-open-source/&amp;title=Deep+Packet+Inspection+Engine+Goes+Open+Source" title="Post to Digg"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/digg/tt-digg-micro3.png" alt="Post to Digg" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/10/deep-packet-inspection-engine-goes-open-source/&amp;title=Deep+Packet+Inspection+Engine+Goes+Open+Source" title="Post to Reddit"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/reddit/tt-reddit-micro3.png" alt="Post to Reddit" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/10/deep-packet-inspection-engine-goes-open-source/&amp;title=Deep+Packet+Inspection+Engine+Goes+Open+Source" title="Post to StumbleUpon"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/su/tt-su-micro3.png" alt="Post to StumbleUpon" /></a></p></div><div class="AWD_like_button "><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.darknet.org.uk%2F2009%2F10%2Fdeep-packet-inspection-engine-goes-open-source%2F&amp;send=false&amp;layout=standard&amp;width=&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=40" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:px; height:40px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/10/deep-packet-inspection-engine-goes-open-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wireshark 1.2.1 Released &#8211; Network Protocol Analyzer</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/07/wireshark-1-2-1-released-network-protocol-analyzer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/07/wireshark-1-2-1-released-network-protocol-analyzer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darknet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross platform packet sniffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep packet inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethereal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free packet sniffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network packet inspection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network protocol analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network protocol analyzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network-forensics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packet-sniffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows packet sniffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireshark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wireshark is the world&#8217;s foremost network protocol analyzer, and is the de facto (and often de jure) standard across many industries and educational institutions. Wireshark development thrives thanks to the contributions of networking experts across the globe. It is the continuation of a project that started in 1998. Many of you will know it as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Wireshark is the world&#8217;s foremost network protocol analyzer, and is the de facto (and often de jure) standard across many industries and educational institutions.</p>
<p>Wireshark development thrives thanks to the contributions of networking experts across the globe. It is the continuation of a project that started in 1998. Many of you will know it as <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/ethereal/">Ethereal</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Features</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Deep inspection of hundreds of protocols, with more being added all the time</li>
<li>Live capture and offline analysis</li>
<li>Standard three-pane packet browser</li>
<li>Multi-platform: Runs on Windows, Linux, OS X, Solaris, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and many others</li>
<li>Captured network data can be browsed via a GUI, or via the TTY-mode TShark utility</li>
<li>The most powerful display filters in the industry</li>
<li>Rich VoIP analysis</li>
<li>Capture files compressed with gzip can be decompressed on the fly</li>
</ul>
<p>You can see the full changelog for version 1.2.1 here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wireshark.org/docs/relnotes/wireshark-1.2.1.html">Wireshark 1.2.1 Release Notes</a></p>
<p>A LOT of vulnerabilities and bugs have been fixed in this version, some having persisted since version 1.0 &#8211; so it&#8217;d be a good time to upgrade if you haven&#8217;t already.</p>
<p>You can download Wireshark 1.2.1 here:</p>
<p>Windows 32-bit &#8211; <a href="http://wireshark.osmirror.nl/download/win32/wireshark-win32-1.2.1.exe">wireshark-win32-1.2.1.exe</a><br />
Source code &#8211; <a href="http://wireshark.osmirror.nl/download/src/wireshark-1.2.1.tar.bz2">wireshark-1.2.1.tar.bz2</a></p>
<p></p>
<p>Or read more <a href="http://www.wireshark.org/docs/relnotes/wireshark-1.2.1.html">here</a>.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Wireshark+1.2.1+Released+%E2%80%93+Network+Protocol+Analyzer+http%3A%2F%2Fdarknet.org.uk%2F%3Fp%3D1936+from+%40THEdarknet" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/07/wireshark-1-2-1-released-network-protocol-analyzer/&amp;t=Wireshark+1.2.1+Released+%E2%80%93+Network+Protocol+Analyzer" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/facebook/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/07/wireshark-1-2-1-released-network-protocol-analyzer/&amp;imageurl=" title="Post to Google Buzz"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/gbuzz/tt-gbuzz-micro3.png" alt="Post to Google Buzz" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/07/wireshark-1-2-1-released-network-protocol-analyzer/&amp;title=Wireshark+1.2.1+Released+%E2%80%93+Network+Protocol+Analyzer" title="Post to Delicious"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/delicious/tt-delicious-micro3.png" alt="Post to Delicious" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/07/wireshark-1-2-1-released-network-protocol-analyzer/&amp;title=Wireshark+1.2.1+Released+%E2%80%93+Network+Protocol+Analyzer" title="Post to Digg"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/digg/tt-digg-micro3.png" alt="Post to Digg" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/07/wireshark-1-2-1-released-network-protocol-analyzer/&amp;title=Wireshark+1.2.1+Released+%E2%80%93+Network+Protocol+Analyzer" title="Post to Reddit"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/reddit/tt-reddit-micro3.png" alt="Post to Reddit" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/07/wireshark-1-2-1-released-network-protocol-analyzer/&amp;title=Wireshark+1.2.1+Released+%E2%80%93+Network+Protocol+Analyzer" title="Post to StumbleUpon"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/su/tt-su-micro3.png" alt="Post to StumbleUpon" /></a></p></div><div class="AWD_like_button "><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.darknet.org.uk%2F2009%2F07%2Fwireshark-1-2-1-released-network-protocol-analyzer%2F&amp;send=false&amp;layout=standard&amp;width=&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=40" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:px; height:40px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/07/wireshark-1-2-1-released-network-protocol-analyzer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

