<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Darknet - The Darkside &#187; chrome browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/chrome-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:34:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Patches 32 Chrome Browser Bugs &amp; Releases Version 14</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2011/09/google-patches-32-chrome-browser-bugs-releases-version-14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2011/09/google-patches-32-chrome-browser-bugs-releases-version-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darknet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Countermeasures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exploits/Vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome bounty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome v14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome version 15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=3189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google and their Chrome browser have really been stepping things up lately when it comes to security and browsing, we reported not along ago on Google Chrome To Protect Users Against Malicious Executables. Also since we reported on the Chrome bug bounty program back in February 2010 &#8211; Google Willing To Pay Bounty For Chrome [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/google/">Google</a> and their <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/chrome/">Chrome</a> browser have really been stepping things up lately when it comes to security and browsing, we reported not along ago on <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2011/04/google-chrome-to-protect-users-against-malicious-executables/">Google Chrome To Protect Users Against Malicious Executables</a>.</p>
<p>Also since we reported on the Chrome <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/bug-bounty/">bug bounty</a> program back in February 2010 &#8211; <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/02/google-willing-to-pay-bounty-for-chrome-browser-bugs/">Google Willing To Pay Bounty For Chrome Browser Bugs</a> &#8211; it seems to have been a great success.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve paid out a fair amount of money and patched 32 vulnerabilities in the latest version of Chrome (v14) &#8211; do note though, none of the vulnerabilities were of a critical level.</p>
<blockquote><p>Google today patched 32 vulnerabilities in Chrome, paying more than $14,000 in bug bounties as it also upgraded the stable edition of the browser to version 14.</p>
<p>The company called out a pair of developer-oriented additions to Chrome 14 and noted new support for Mac OS X 10.7, aka Lion, including full-screen mode and vanishing scrollbars.</p>
<p>Google last upgraded Chrome&#8217;s stable build in early August. Google produces an update about every six weeks, a practice that rival Mozilla also adopted with the debut of Firefox 5 last June.</p>
<p>Fifteen of the 32 vulnerabilities were rated &#8220;high,&#8221; the second-most-serious ranking in Google&#8217;s four-step scoring system, while 10 were pegged &#8220;medium&#8221; and the remaining seven were marked &#8220;low.&#8221;</p>
<p>None of the flaws were ranked &#8220;critical,&#8221; the category usually reserved for bugs that may allow an attacker to escape Chrome&#8217;s anti-exploit sandbox. Google has patched several critical bugs this year, the last time in April.</p>
<p>Six of the vulnerabilities rated high were identified as &#8220;use-after-free&#8221; bugs, a type of memory management flaw that can be exploited to inject attack code, while seven of the bugs ranked medium were &#8220;out-of-bounds&#8221; flaws, including a pair linked to foreign language character sets used in Cambodia and Tibet. </p></blockquote>
<p>I think the whole bug bounty model is great, I mean look at it this way &#8211; Google has paid out $14,000 in bug bounties for these vulnerabilities. That&#8217;s a small fraction of what it would cost to get a &#8216;professional&#8217; company to do as a VA or <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/code-audit/">code-audit</a> on the software.</p>
<p>Plus for the researchers, they get to practise their skills and make a little pocket money on the side. I don&#8217;t expect anyone to hand over any critical <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/0-day/">0-day</a> type exploits for the amount Google is offering, but still &#8211; it makes the browser more secure.</p>
<p>And at the end of the day, more secure browsers make for less virus laden family members and colleagues (and less of that annoying work which we can&#8217;t escape for us).</p>
<p><div align="center"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-3033787195489589";
/* Darknet-Body468 */
google_ad_slot = "1341243171";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div><br /></p>
<blockquote><p>Google paid $14,337 in bounties to nine researchers, including $3,500 to &#8220;miaubiz&#8221; and $2,337 to Sergey Glazunov, another regular bug finder.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s security team also credited others, including researchers who work for Microsoft and Apple, for &#8220;working with us in the development cycle and preventing bugs from ever reaching the stable channel.&#8221; Some of those researchers were also awarded bounties, but Google did not spell out the amounts of those awards.</p>
<p>As per its practice, Google barred access to the Chrome bug-tracking database for the 32 vulnerabilities to prevent outsiders from obtaining details on the flaws. The company only opens the database after users have had time to update the browser.</p>
<p>Google also added a pair of developer-only features to Chrome 14, including support for the Web Audio API (application programming interface) and for &#8220;native client,&#8221; an open-source technology that runs software written in C and C++ within Chrome&#8217;s security sandbox.</p>
<p>The Mac version of Chrome 14 also supports Lion&#8217;s new approach to scrollbars, which appear only when a user is actively scrolling through the browser window. Chrome 14 also now runs in Lion&#8217;s full-screen mode, triggered via the icon in the upper right of the browser or by pressing Ctrl-Command-F.</p>
<p>But Chrome&#8217;s full-screen support isn&#8217;t polished or finished; the browser won&#8217;t return to its windowed view with a press of the Escape key, as do Apple&#8217;s home-grown applications in Lion. </p></blockquote>
<p>Seems like Google had some help from <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/category/apple-hacking/">Apple</a> and <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/microsoft/">Microsoft</a> too &#8211; good to see the big boys working together.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve given up on <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/firefox/">Firefox</a>, I tried using Chrome for a while but didn&#8217;t really get on with it (seemed like a massive memory hog). I&#8217;ve recently switched to <a href="http://www.palemoon.org/">Palemoon</a> (a Windows optimised version of Firefox) and it&#8217;s great so far.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/091611-google-patches-32-chrome-bugs-250996.html?source=nww_rss">Network World</a></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Google+Patches+32+Chrome+Browser+Bugs+%26+Releases+Version+14+http%3A%2F%2Fdarknet.org.uk%2F%3Fp%3D3189+from+%40THEdarknet" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2011/09/google-patches-32-chrome-browser-bugs-releases-version-14/&amp;t=Google+Patches+32+Chrome+Browser+Bugs+%26+Releases+Version+14" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/facebook/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2011/09/google-patches-32-chrome-browser-bugs-releases-version-14/&amp;imageurl=" title="Post to Google Buzz"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/gbuzz/tt-gbuzz-micro3.png" alt="Post to Google Buzz" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2011/09/google-patches-32-chrome-browser-bugs-releases-version-14/&amp;title=Google+Patches+32+Chrome+Browser+Bugs+%26+Releases+Version+14" title="Post to Delicious"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/delicious/tt-delicious-micro3.png" alt="Post to Delicious" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2011/09/google-patches-32-chrome-browser-bugs-releases-version-14/&amp;title=Google+Patches+32+Chrome+Browser+Bugs+%26+Releases+Version+14" title="Post to Digg"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/digg/tt-digg-micro3.png" alt="Post to Digg" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2011/09/google-patches-32-chrome-browser-bugs-releases-version-14/&amp;title=Google+Patches+32+Chrome+Browser+Bugs+%26+Releases+Version+14" title="Post to Reddit"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/reddit/tt-reddit-micro3.png" alt="Post to Reddit" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2011/09/google-patches-32-chrome-browser-bugs-releases-version-14/&amp;title=Google+Patches+32+Chrome+Browser+Bugs+%26+Releases+Version+14" title="Post to StumbleUpon"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/su/tt-su-micro3.png" alt="Post to StumbleUpon" /></a></p></div><div class="AWD_like_button "><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.darknet.org.uk%2F2011%2F09%2Fgoogle-patches-32-chrome-browser-bugs-releases-version-14%2F&amp;send=false&amp;layout=standard&amp;width=&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=40" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:px; height:40px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2011/09/google-patches-32-chrome-browser-bugs-releases-version-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Willing To Pay Bounty For Chrome Browser Bugs</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/02/google-willing-to-pay-bounty-for-chrome-browser-bugs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/02/google-willing-to-pay-bounty-for-chrome-browser-bugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darknet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploits/Vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bounty for exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser-Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser-security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug bounty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploit bounty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google exploit bounty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid to hack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=2486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a pretty interesting development from Google and also seems to be coming much more common now, companies openly offering payments for bugs/vulnerabilities discovered in their software. It&#8217;s a chance for the white-hat guys to earn a few bucks, but honestly I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to change anything. Especially not when we&#8217;re talking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>This is a pretty interesting development from <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/google/">Google</a> and also seems to be coming much more common now, companies openly offering payments for bugs/vulnerabilities discovered in their software.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a chance for the white-hat guys to earn a few bucks, but honestly I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to change anything. Especially not when we&#8217;re talking $500 per vulnerability.</p>
<p>A serious browser 0-day exploit that can allow execution of malware will go for 100 times that much on the black market so there&#8217;s no real incentive for the bad guys to give up their code for $500.</p>
<blockquote><p>Google yesterday announced a bug-bounty program that will pay researchers $500 for each vulnerability they report in the Chrome browser and its underlying open-source code.</p>
<p>In a post to the Chromium project&#8217;s blog , Chris Evans, who works on the Chrome security team, said the base bounty would be $500, but that &#8220;particularly severe or particularly clever&#8221; bugs would reap rewards of $1,337 each.</p>
<p>The latter amount is a reference to &#8220;leet,&#8221; a kind of geek-speak used by some researchers; there, &#8220;leet&#8221; is rendered as &#8220;1337.&#8221;</p>
<p>New vulnerabilities in Chrome, Chromium &#8212; the open-source project that Google uses to craft Chrome &#8212; and plug-ins that ship with Chrome, such as Google Gears, are eligible for bounties, said Evans. Bugs that are ranked &#8220;high&#8221; or &#8220;critical&#8221; in Chrome&#8217;s rating system get preference, he added, but others may be considered. </p></blockquote>
<p>Even for the particularly severe or clever bugs they can award up to $1,337, that&#8217;s still peanuts compared to what they can sell the exploit for on the open market &#8211; or even to companies like TippingPoint ZDI who claim to pay 10 times more (which would be more reasonable, $5000 for a working exploit).</p>
<p>I hope it helps though and gives some legitimate security researches a little more incentive to focus on <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/google-chrome/">Chrome</a>, the bad guys won&#8217;t pay much attention though as Chrome is still a relatively small player in the browser world.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We are hoping that &#8230; this program will encourage new individuals to participate in Chromium security,&#8221; said Evans. &#8220;The more people involved in scrutinizing Chromium&#8217;s code and behavior, the more secure our millions of users will be.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Internet Explorer, Safari, Firefox&#8230;those browsers have been out there for a long time,&#8221; said Pedram Amini, manager of the security research team at 3com&#8217;s Austin, Tex.-based TippingPoint, which operates Zero Day Initiative (ZDI), one of the two best-known bug-bounty programs. &#8220;But Chrome, and now Chrome OS, need researchers. Google needs people to put eyes on the target.&#8221;</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s new bounty program isn&#8217;t the first from a software vendor looking for help rooting out vulnerabilities in its own code, but it&#8217;s the largest company to step forward, Amini said. Microsoft , for example, has traditionally dismissed any calls that it pay for vulnerabilities. &#8220;This will be beneficial to Google,&#8221; Amini added. &#8220;There are actually very few vendors who play in the bounty market, but Google doing it is definitely interesting.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t realistically expect any groundbreaking bugs to come out of this initiative, but I think a few people might bust out their <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/01/browser-fuzzer-3-bf3-comprehensive-web-browser-fuzzing-tool/">browser fuzzing tools</a> and see what they can find.</p>
<p>Worth a bit of effort if you can find 10 decent bugs in a couple of hours and net yourself $5000usd.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/012910-google-to-pay-bounties-for.html">Network World</a></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Google+Willing+To+Pay+Bounty+For+Chrome+Browser+Bugs+http%3A%2F%2Fdarknet.org.uk%2F%3Fp%3D2486+from+%40THEdarknet" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/02/google-willing-to-pay-bounty-for-chrome-browser-bugs/&amp;t=Google+Willing+To+Pay+Bounty+For+Chrome+Browser+Bugs" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/facebook/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/02/google-willing-to-pay-bounty-for-chrome-browser-bugs/&amp;imageurl=" title="Post to Google Buzz"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/gbuzz/tt-gbuzz-micro3.png" alt="Post to Google Buzz" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/02/google-willing-to-pay-bounty-for-chrome-browser-bugs/&amp;title=Google+Willing+To+Pay+Bounty+For+Chrome+Browser+Bugs" title="Post to Delicious"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/delicious/tt-delicious-micro3.png" alt="Post to Delicious" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/02/google-willing-to-pay-bounty-for-chrome-browser-bugs/&amp;title=Google+Willing+To+Pay+Bounty+For+Chrome+Browser+Bugs" title="Post to Digg"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/digg/tt-digg-micro3.png" alt="Post to Digg" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/02/google-willing-to-pay-bounty-for-chrome-browser-bugs/&amp;title=Google+Willing+To+Pay+Bounty+For+Chrome+Browser+Bugs" title="Post to Reddit"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/reddit/tt-reddit-micro3.png" alt="Post to Reddit" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/02/google-willing-to-pay-bounty-for-chrome-browser-bugs/&amp;title=Google+Willing+To+Pay+Bounty+For+Chrome+Browser+Bugs" title="Post to StumbleUpon"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/su/tt-su-micro3.png" alt="Post to StumbleUpon" /></a></p></div><div class="AWD_like_button "><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.darknet.org.uk%2F2010%2F02%2Fgoogle-willing-to-pay-bounty-for-chrome-browser-bugs%2F&amp;send=false&amp;layout=standard&amp;width=&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=40" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:px; height:40px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/02/google-willing-to-pay-bounty-for-chrome-browser-bugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Releases New Browser Chrome &#8211; Vulnerabilities on First Day</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/google-releases-new-browser-chrome-vulnerabilities-on-first-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/google-releases-new-browser-chrome-vulnerabilities-on-first-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darknet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploits/Vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser-exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser-security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome exploit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google chrome vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking google chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software-security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as most of you probably know the big buzz on the Internet last week was that Google (after supporting Firefox for so long) have actually launched their own browser. It&#8217;s cooled Google Chrome. Now of course in typical Google fashion they call it BETA software, and a number of flaws have popped up during [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>So as most of you probably know the big buzz on the Internet last week was that Google (after supporting Firefox for so long) have actually launched their own browser.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s cooled <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Google Chrome</a>. Now of course in typical Google fashion they call it BETA software, and a number of flaws have popped up during the first couple of days of release.</p>
<p>One cool thing though is that each tab runs it&#8217;s own threaded process, so if one tab bombs out it won&#8217;t take down your whole browser.</p>
<p>The browser is a move for Google into the online/offline integration they started with <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/tag/google-desktop/">Google Desktop</a>, there are more and more online apps (Google Office) that people still want to use offline with a Google made browser this will be possible.</p>
<p>You also have to consider the privacy implications though, if you are also using Gmail&#8230;Google will basically know everything you do, even worse if you also use Google Desktop they will know what you have on your computer, what e-mail you send and receive and what you surf on the web.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://valleywag.com/5046665/german-government-tells-citizens-not-to-use-google-chrome">German Government has come out and told its citzens NOT to use Google Chrome</a>.</p>
<p>There have been a few flaws released since Chrome came out such as a <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1843">carpet bombing flaw</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Google’s shiny new Web browser is vulnerable to a carpet-bombing vulnerability that could expose Windows users to malicious hacker attacks.</p>
<p>Just hours after the release of Google Chrome, researcher Aviv Raff discovered that he could combine two vulnerabilities — a flaw in Apple Safari (WebKit) and a Java bug discussed at this year’s Black Hat conference — to trick users into launching executables direct from the new browser.</p></blockquote>
<p>The PoC is here: <a href="http://raffon.net/research/google/chrome/carpet.html">http://raffon.net/research/google/chrome/carpet.html</a></p>
<p>Another is a crash in chrome.dlll.</p>
<blockquote><p>An issue exists in how chrome behaves with undefined-handlers in chrome.dll version 0.2.149.27. A crash can result without user interaction. When a user is made to visit a malicious link, which has an undefined handler followed by a &#8216;special&#8217; character, the chrome crashes with a Google Chrome message window &#8220;Whoa! Google Chrome has crashed. Restart now?&#8221;. It fails in dealing with the POP EBP instruction when pointed out by the EIP register at 0x01002FF4.</p></blockquote>
<p>The PoC is here: <a href="http://evilfingers.com/advisory/google_chrome_poc.php">http://evilfingers.com/advisory/google_chrome_poc.php</a></p>
<p>And a few people have also been complaining that it allows auto-download of executable without a user prompt.</p>
<p></p>
<p>We will be keeping an eye on Google Chrome.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Google+Releases+New+Browser+Chrome+%E2%80%93+Vulnerabilities+on+First+Day+http%3A%2F%2Fdarknet.org.uk%2F%3Fp%3D1039+from+%40THEdarknet" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/google-releases-new-browser-chrome-vulnerabilities-on-first-day/&amp;t=Google+Releases+New+Browser+Chrome+%E2%80%93+Vulnerabilities+on+First+Day" title="Post to Facebook"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/facebook/tt-facebook-micro3.png" alt="Post to Facebook" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/google-releases-new-browser-chrome-vulnerabilities-on-first-day/&amp;imageurl=" title="Post to Google Buzz"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/gbuzz/tt-gbuzz-micro3.png" alt="Post to Google Buzz" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://delicious.com/post?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/google-releases-new-browser-chrome-vulnerabilities-on-first-day/&amp;title=Google+Releases+New+Browser+Chrome+%E2%80%93+Vulnerabilities+on+First+Day" title="Post to Delicious"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/delicious/tt-delicious-micro3.png" alt="Post to Delicious" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://digg.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/google-releases-new-browser-chrome-vulnerabilities-on-first-day/&amp;title=Google+Releases+New+Browser+Chrome+%E2%80%93+Vulnerabilities+on+First+Day" title="Post to Digg"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/digg/tt-digg-micro3.png" alt="Post to Digg" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/google-releases-new-browser-chrome-vulnerabilities-on-first-day/&amp;title=Google+Releases+New+Browser+Chrome+%E2%80%93+Vulnerabilities+on+First+Day" title="Post to Reddit"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/reddit/tt-reddit-micro3.png" alt="Post to Reddit" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/google-releases-new-browser-chrome-vulnerabilities-on-first-day/&amp;title=Google+Releases+New+Browser+Chrome+%E2%80%93+Vulnerabilities+on+First+Day" title="Post to StumbleUpon"><img class="nothumb" src="http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/su/tt-su-micro3.png" alt="Post to StumbleUpon" /></a></p></div><div class="AWD_like_button "><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.darknet.org.uk%2F2008%2F09%2Fgoogle-releases-new-browser-chrome-vulnerabilities-on-first-day%2F&amp;send=false&amp;layout=standard&amp;width=&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=40" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:px; height:40px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/google-releases-new-browser-chrome-vulnerabilities-on-first-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

