<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SSL Renegotiation Bug Succesfully Used To Attack Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/11/ssl-renegotiation-bug-succesfully-used-to-attack-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/11/ssl-renegotiation-bug-succesfully-used-to-attack-twitter/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: emerging</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/11/ssl-renegotiation-bug-succesfully-used-to-attack-twitter/#comment-160094</link>
		<dc:creator>emerging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=2293#comment-160094</guid>
		<description>i&#039;v seen the prove of concept attacks in a paper 2 weeks back :). surfed around the so called -security - sites they were all underestimating the vulnerability -miss design- . that paper describes 3 scenario  for exploiting this vulnerability :) .  and i guess there reaction was to only elude ppl. But the real disaster is going to be when when you read about the use of &quot;hash clash&quot; method to attack certificates. the method is well documented and has a prove of concept experiments but, again they say it is far from being used . because bla bla bla. so shall we sit and wait OR be of the first ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;v seen the prove of concept attacks in a paper 2 weeks back :). surfed around the so called -security &#8211; sites they were all underestimating the vulnerability -miss design- . that paper describes 3 scenario  for exploiting this vulnerability :) .  and i guess there reaction was to only elude ppl. But the real disaster is going to be when when you read about the use of &#8220;hash clash&#8221; method to attack certificates. the method is well documented and has a prove of concept experiments but, again they say it is far from being used . because bla bla bla. so shall we sit and wait OR be of the first ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d3m4s1@d0v1v0</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/11/ssl-renegotiation-bug-succesfully-used-to-attack-twitter/#comment-160071</link>
		<dc:creator>d3m4s1@d0v1v0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=2293#comment-160071</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see the proof of concept. I was following this failure since last week and I find it very interesting.
I haven&#039;t time to prove it, but I think it can be used easily on a private LAN placing a mitm attack. 
This twitter attack reveal account information, but even without doing that, you can do interesting things, like sending a message with your boss e-mail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see the proof of concept. I was following this failure since last week and I find it very interesting.<br />
I haven&#8217;t time to prove it, but I think it can be used easily on a private LAN placing a mitm attack.<br />
This twitter attack reveal account information, but even without doing that, you can do interesting things, like sending a message with your boss e-mail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

