<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WarVOX 1.0.1 Released &#8211; Telephony Analysis &amp; War Dialing Suite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/05/warvox-101-released-telephony-analysis-war-dialing-suite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/05/warvox-101-released-telephony-analysis-war-dialing-suite/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: erleko</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/05/warvox-101-released-telephony-analysis-war-dialing-suite/#comment-158221</link>
		<dc:creator>erleko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1801#comment-158221</guid>
		<description>ye s you will be caught and prosectued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ye s you will be caught and prosectued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogwitch</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/05/warvox-101-released-telephony-analysis-war-dialing-suite/#comment-157046</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogwitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1801#comment-157046</guid>
		<description>As with all forms of penetration testing, without the system owner&#039;s permission would be illegal (in most contries)

If you try to run a war-dialler without permission from the target owner, expect to get v&amp;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with all forms of penetration testing, without the system owner&#8217;s permission would be illegal (in most contries)</p>
<p>If you try to run a war-dialler without permission from the target owner, expect to get v&amp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annon</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/05/warvox-101-released-telephony-analysis-war-dialing-suite/#comment-156950</link>
		<dc:creator>annon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1801#comment-156950</guid>
		<description>ok my question is: is this legal? because i see it just as war driving only by using ur dial up modem as the &quot;beacon&quot;... thing is i have heard that after the &quot;phone phreaking&quot; age implementations were put in so users could not war dial and if they were caught doing so they might be punished to the full extent of the law!?! am i wrong in saying this might be gray area sofware? I would like to know seeing as how im interested... 

thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok my question is: is this legal? because i see it just as war driving only by using ur dial up modem as the &#8220;beacon&#8221;&#8230; thing is i have heard that after the &#8220;phone phreaking&#8221; age implementations were put in so users could not war dial and if they were caught doing so they might be punished to the full extent of the law!?! am i wrong in saying this might be gray area sofware? I would like to know seeing as how im interested&#8230; </p>
<p>thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: send9</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/05/warvox-101-released-telephony-analysis-war-dialing-suite/#comment-154563</link>
		<dc:creator>send9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1801#comment-154563</guid>
		<description>Navin: It&#039;s important for many of the reasons you stated. People secure their Internet-facing hosts, but forget about their back-up dial-in modems. Vendors will come in and put a modem on their router/equipment/HVAC system for maintenance purpose without telling the organization, as well. Oftentimes the organization is lulled into a false sense of security, without being aware that this threat exists. They will perform their own security audits, but will not include their dial-in lines. It&#039;s just an area that&#039;s often missed, and one where pen-testers will often have a finding, whereas everything else is in perfect shape. Is it as important as a decade ago? Probably not. But it&#039;s certainly very important.

And to add to that, there&#039;s not a whole lot of good war dialing software on the market. There are the classics like THCScan and ToneLoc, but they don&#039;t perform a whole lot in the way of intelligent detection of carriers and just don&#039;t scale well for modern environments or larger pen-tests. And then there&#039;s Sandstorm&#039;s PhoneSweep, which is buggy and expensive. So to see something like WarVOX, with its new approach and focus on using VoIP, is pretty exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Navin: It&#8217;s important for many of the reasons you stated. People secure their Internet-facing hosts, but forget about their back-up dial-in modems. Vendors will come in and put a modem on their router/equipment/HVAC system for maintenance purpose without telling the organization, as well. Oftentimes the organization is lulled into a false sense of security, without being aware that this threat exists. They will perform their own security audits, but will not include their dial-in lines. It&#8217;s just an area that&#8217;s often missed, and one where pen-testers will often have a finding, whereas everything else is in perfect shape. Is it as important as a decade ago? Probably not. But it&#8217;s certainly very important.</p>
<p>And to add to that, there&#8217;s not a whole lot of good war dialing software on the market. There are the classics like THCScan and ToneLoc, but they don&#8217;t perform a whole lot in the way of intelligent detection of carriers and just don&#8217;t scale well for modern environments or larger pen-tests. And then there&#8217;s Sandstorm&#8217;s PhoneSweep, which is buggy and expensive. So to see something like WarVOX, with its new approach and focus on using VoIP, is pretty exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogwitch</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/05/warvox-101-released-telephony-analysis-war-dialing-suite/#comment-154507</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogwitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1801#comment-154507</guid>
		<description>Hi Navin,

You&#039;re right to say it&#039;s not as relevant today as it may have been in the past however, there are still some legacy systems that are connected via modems, some &#039;emergency access&#039; points, some network infrastructure and some SCADA stuff.
The ability to detect PBX, voicemail etc gives an additional avenue where social engineering can be exploited, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Navin,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right to say it&#8217;s not as relevant today as it may have been in the past however, there are still some legacy systems that are connected via modems, some &#8216;emergency access&#8217; points, some network infrastructure and some SCADA stuff.<br />
The ability to detect PBX, voicemail etc gives an additional avenue where social engineering can be exploited, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navin</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/05/warvox-101-released-telephony-analysis-war-dialing-suite/#comment-154467</link>
		<dc:creator>Navin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 07:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1801#comment-154467</guid>
		<description>OK, I just wanted to ask this to someone who actually knows, so I&#039;ll just blurt it out.....

is wardialling really still really as important as it was a decade or two ago?? I mean I do know tht many greats started off with stuff like wardialling, but whts really the use of a traditional wardialling in todays scenario of high speed broadband internet??

please someone clarify......sorry if this seems like a n00b question</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I just wanted to ask this to someone who actually knows, so I&#8217;ll just blurt it out&#8230;..</p>
<p>is wardialling really still really as important as it was a decade or two ago?? I mean I do know tht many greats started off with stuff like wardialling, but whts really the use of a traditional wardialling in todays scenario of high speed broadband internet??</p>
<p>please someone clarify&#8230;&#8230;sorry if this seems like a n00b question</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

