Comments on: Interceptor – Wireless Wired Network Tap (Fon+) http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/interceptor-wireless-wired-network-tap-fon/ Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing & Computer Security Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:17:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bogwitch http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/interceptor-wireless-wired-network-tap-fon/#comment-145861 Bogwitch Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:09:57 +0000 http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1618#comment-145861 Peter, The Interceptor code is used to run on a fon+ device connected to the target network. You would need to use a second device to collect the log information, probably a PC using wireshark. If you are having a hard time interpreting the output of wireshark, I would suggest (and I'm trying not to be patronising here) that you need to learn more, you did say you were a novice! The output from wireshark is among he easiest to follow, filter and process. When I was learning about packet capture and analysis - pre-wireshark days, I started by generating known traffic, ftp, telnet, smtp, pop etc. HTH Peter,

The Interceptor code is used to run on a fon+ device connected to the target network. You would need to use a second device to collect the log information, probably a PC using wireshark.

If you are having a hard time interpreting the output of wireshark, I would suggest (and I’m trying not to be patronising here) that you need to learn more, you did say you were a novice! The output from wireshark is among he easiest to follow, filter and process. When I was learning about packet capture and analysis – pre-wireshark days, I started by generating known traffic, ftp, telnet, smtp, pop etc.

HTH

]]> By: peter http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/interceptor-wireless-wired-network-tap-fon/#comment-145145 peter Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:42:23 +0000 http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1618#comment-145145 guys could i ask one thing i have read the blog about the interceptor and i would like to ask any of people that have been using the program to compare it ithey have compared it to whitehsark as i know whiteshark has th capability to intercept packets but i aint to sure on the data that it collects would come out like interceptor if any ione has compared the two could you let me know beacuse i know that the packets that whiteshark collects are not fully interceptable readble data packets it takes asmall amount of knowledge of how to define the packets that you have and collct arelativity of data to read them but with interceptor is it or does the program give you the data as it sees from say a printer like the document as it is or do you have to decode it to make it readable handy program if it could would save me a lot of time but i do say i ask this question as a novice ......shadowdevelopment guys could i ask one thing i have read the blog about the interceptor and i would like to ask any of people that have been using the program to compare it ithey have compared it to whitehsark as i know whiteshark has th capability to intercept packets but i aint to sure on the data that it collects would come out like interceptor if any ione has compared the two could you let me know beacuse i know that the packets that whiteshark collects are not fully interceptable readble data packets it takes asmall amount of knowledge of how to define the packets that you have and collct arelativity of data to read them but with interceptor is it or does the program give you the data as it sees from say a printer like the document as it is or do you have to decode it to make it readable handy program if it could would save me a lot of time but i do say i ask this question as a novice ……shadowdevelopment

]]>