<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conficker Finally Awakes &amp; Dumps Payload</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/conficker-finally-awakes-dumps-payload/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/conficker-finally-awakes-dumps-payload/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darknet</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/conficker-finally-awakes-dumps-payload/#comment-143348</link>
		<dc:creator>Darknet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1697#comment-143348</guid>
		<description>I think perhaps he meant drivel rather than diatribe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think perhaps he meant drivel rather than diatribe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/conficker-finally-awakes-dumps-payload/#comment-143300</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1697#comment-143300</guid>
		<description>lol really, you call &#039;^^&#039; or &#039;a whim&#039; a diatribe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol really, you call &#8216;^^&#8217; or &#8216;a whim&#8217; a diatribe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogwitch</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/conficker-finally-awakes-dumps-payload/#comment-143234</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogwitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1697#comment-143234</guid>
		<description>Not a hater, just suggesting that if you are going to cast doubt on my suppositions, you should be prepared to back it up with a reasoned arguement rather that the diatribe you spouted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a hater, just suggesting that if you are going to cast doubt on my suppositions, you should be prepared to back it up with a reasoned arguement rather that the diatribe you spouted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HyPnOtIcHaCkEr</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/conficker-finally-awakes-dumps-payload/#comment-143208</link>
		<dc:creator>HyPnOtIcHaCkEr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1697#comment-143208</guid>
		<description>No one likes a hater so stop being one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one likes a hater so stop being one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogwitch</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/conficker-finally-awakes-dumps-payload/#comment-143195</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogwitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1697#comment-143195</guid>
		<description>@HyPnOtIcHaCkEr

Intelligent input darlin&#039; why don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@HyPnOtIcHaCkEr</p>
<p>Intelligent input darlin&#8217; why don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HyPnOtIcHaCkEr</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/conficker-finally-awakes-dumps-payload/#comment-143191</link>
		<dc:creator>HyPnOtIcHaCkEr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1697#comment-143191</guid>
		<description>A whim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A whim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogwitch</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/conficker-finally-awakes-dumps-payload/#comment-143136</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogwitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1697#comment-143136</guid>
		<description>@HyPnOtIcHaCkEr

On what do you base that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@HyPnOtIcHaCkEr</p>
<p>On what do you base that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogwitch</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/conficker-finally-awakes-dumps-payload/#comment-143074</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogwitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1697#comment-143074</guid>
		<description>@Tom Allen,

I understand what you&#039;re saying, but their motivation is not fame or noteriety, but cash. There is no profit in a DDOS of Google, unless a blackmail attempt on Google would be successful, which I doubt and the fake AV is charged at a high rate which should make the controllers a tidy sum, given the supposed number of infections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tom Allen,</p>
<p>I understand what you&#8217;re saying, but their motivation is not fame or noteriety, but cash. There is no profit in a DDOS of Google, unless a blackmail attempt on Google would be successful, which I doubt and the fake AV is charged at a high rate which should make the controllers a tidy sum, given the supposed number of infections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/conficker-finally-awakes-dumps-payload/#comment-142914</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1697#comment-142914</guid>
		<description>All that and they do this, couldn&#039;t they have done something more spectacular like DDOS google. 
Fake Anti-virus. Lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All that and they do this, couldn&#8217;t they have done something more spectacular like DDOS google.<br />
Fake Anti-virus. Lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Storey</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/04/conficker-finally-awakes-dumps-payload/#comment-142455</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan Storey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1697#comment-142455</guid>
		<description>@Bogwitch: if it were me thats when I would launch it. As great military strategists have said if you want to take over a country quickly do it on a long weekend.
I fits for the update that was pushed out on the 1st, then the payload gets pushed a few days later after you verify your clients have updated.

I am heartened by the work MS have actually done to contain this, but I think it will quickly disperse into several smaller and less newsworthy botnets, that is unless users actually update their os.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bogwitch: if it were me thats when I would launch it. As great military strategists have said if you want to take over a country quickly do it on a long weekend.<br />
I fits for the update that was pushed out on the 1st, then the payload gets pushed a few days later after you verify your clients have updated.</p>
<p>I am heartened by the work MS have actually done to contain this, but I think it will quickly disperse into several smaller and less newsworthy botnets, that is unless users actually update their os.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

