<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Native Client Security/Hacking Contest &#8211; Win $8,192 USD!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/03/google-native-client-securityhacking-contest-win-8192-usd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/03/google-native-client-securityhacking-contest-win-8192-usd/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Storey</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/03/google-native-client-securityhacking-contest-win-8192-usd/#comment-132575</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan Storey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1552#comment-132575</guid>
		<description>Deezy, I think google would have put more thought into having a security model than the ActiveX guys did who did it pre the big push for web security, and under a limited time frame. From a cursory glance it looks like it is running in a sandbox or virtual OS spawned by the client, something posix compatible.
That being said, it looks cool, but I am not sure I like its security implications. Some really nifty stuff can be done with raw x86 code and I am sure some pretty tricky viruses, break-out of the sandbox and it is all over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deezy, I think google would have put more thought into having a security model than the ActiveX guys did who did it pre the big push for web security, and under a limited time frame. From a cursory glance it looks like it is running in a sandbox or virtual OS spawned by the client, something posix compatible.<br />
That being said, it looks cool, but I am not sure I like its security implications. Some really nifty stuff can be done with raw x86 code and I am sure some pretty tricky viruses, break-out of the sandbox and it is all over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HyPnOtIcHaCkEr</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/03/google-native-client-securityhacking-contest-win-8192-usd/#comment-132574</link>
		<dc:creator>HyPnOtIcHaCkEr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1552#comment-132574</guid>
		<description>1st prize: $8,192.00/1024=8
2nd prize: $4,096.00/1024=4
3rd prize: $2,048.00/1024=2
4th prize: $1,024.00/1024=1 
5th prize: $1,024.00/1024=1


its all in megabytes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1st prize: $8,192.00/1024=8<br />
2nd prize: $4,096.00/1024=4<br />
3rd prize: $2,048.00/1024=2<br />
4th prize: $1,024.00/1024=1<br />
5th prize: $1,024.00/1024=1</p>
<p>its all in megabytes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navin</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/03/google-native-client-securityhacking-contest-win-8192-usd/#comment-132393</link>
		<dc:creator>navin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1552#comment-132393</guid>
		<description>very weird, what with fractals shown on the nativeclient page, and the weird number of $8192 for a prize.....its more of a try to hack my app kinda contest!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very weird, what with fractals shown on the nativeclient page, and the weird number of $8192 for a prize&#8230;..its more of a try to hack my app kinda contest!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deezy</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/03/google-native-client-securityhacking-contest-win-8192-usd/#comment-132380</link>
		<dc:creator>Deezy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1552#comment-132380</guid>
		<description>How is this different than ActiveX?..  Other than it&#039;s open and not done by MS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this different than ActiveX?..  Other than it&#8217;s open and not done by MS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
