<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner 6 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/01/acunetix-web-vulnerability-scanner-6-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/01/acunetix-web-vulnerability-scanner-6-review/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/01/acunetix-web-vulnerability-scanner-6-review/#comment-125423</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1389#comment-125423</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review.

The last time I used acunetix (more than a year ago) it was clearly inferior to other application scanners like Appscan or HP WebInspect.

However, acutenix is way cheaper (by a factor of 3 or 4).

Have you tested other scanners, how do you range them comparing to Acunetix ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review.</p>
<p>The last time I used acunetix (more than a year ago) it was clearly inferior to other application scanners like Appscan or HP WebInspect.</p>
<p>However, acutenix is way cheaper (by a factor of 3 or 4).</p>
<p>Have you tested other scanners, how do you range them comparing to Acunetix ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethicalhack3r</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/01/acunetix-web-vulnerability-scanner-6-review/#comment-125418</link>
		<dc:creator>ethicalhack3r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1389#comment-125418</guid>
		<description>I have also played around with AWVS in the past and found it to be a great tool however it is very noisy and would be useless at the beggining of a black box test. I suppose in a black box enviroment it could be used towards the end of the pen test, just to make sure you havent missed anything out while manually testing. I have also heard that in some cases it has produced DoS&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also played around with AWVS in the past and found it to be a great tool however it is very noisy and would be useless at the beggining of a black box test. I suppose in a black box enviroment it could be used towards the end of the pen test, just to make sure you havent missed anything out while manually testing. I have also heard that in some cases it has produced DoS&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Olson</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/01/acunetix-web-vulnerability-scanner-6-review/#comment-125417</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1389#comment-125417</guid>
		<description>THis is a nice tool and I agree some more new nice features.  But for automated assessing of your web apps I would go with Cenzic.  It has greater flexibility, larger vuln library and is awhole lot more mature of a solution.  I have used this for about a year and recommend it to those who want to move from manually doing the testing to automating it.  They are a pretty cool bunch of people too.  Small company that answers the phone.  I tried their free tools but went up to their Pro version - more capabilities.  They will let you test drive the pro.  I emailed their support and just asked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THis is a nice tool and I agree some more new nice features.  But for automated assessing of your web apps I would go with Cenzic.  It has greater flexibility, larger vuln library and is awhole lot more mature of a solution.  I have used this for about a year and recommend it to those who want to move from manually doing the testing to automating it.  They are a pretty cool bunch of people too.  Small company that answers the phone.  I tried their free tools but went up to their Pro version &#8211; more capabilities.  They will let you test drive the pro.  I emailed their support and just asked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devturkler</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/01/acunetix-web-vulnerability-scanner-6-review/#comment-125416</link>
		<dc:creator>devturkler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1389#comment-125416</guid>
		<description>Thanks acunetix is very nice scanner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks acunetix is very nice scanner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/01/acunetix-web-vulnerability-scanner-6-review/#comment-125415</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1389#comment-125415</guid>
		<description>I use this tool quite often for clients who want their web content examined and it is truly a wonderful application.  A+ on the review and 2 huge thumbs up to Accunetix.  Awesome work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use this tool quite often for clients who want their web content examined and it is truly a wonderful application.  A+ on the review and 2 huge thumbs up to Accunetix.  Awesome work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoL_ShaD</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2009/01/acunetix-web-vulnerability-scanner-6-review/#comment-125413</link>
		<dc:creator>CoL_ShaD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1389#comment-125413</guid>
		<description>I personally think this is a great tool that every webmaster should have in order to keep things secured and running good. One of the features that like is &quot;Crawiling Options.&quot; This program gives you everything needed to discover weaknesses in code or any flaw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think this is a great tool that every webmaster should have in order to keep things secured and running good. One of the features that like is &#8220;Crawiling Options.&#8221; This program gives you everything needed to discover weaknesses in code or any flaw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
