<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Breaks Patch Cycle to Issue IE Patch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/12/microsoft-breaks-patch-cycle-to-issue-ie-patch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/12/microsoft-breaks-patch-cycle-to-issue-ie-patch/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: navin</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/12/microsoft-breaks-patch-cycle-to-issue-ie-patch/#comment-125249</link>
		<dc:creator>navin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1319#comment-125249</guid>
		<description>not tht MS had an option....dunno how far this is true, but I read sumwhere tht the patch issued isn&#039;t actually a cure for the remote code execution exploit but is rather simply a detection tool for the exploit so tht IE can identify bugged sites......MS is supposedly still working on a full blown solution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not tht MS had an option&#8230;.dunno how far this is true, but I read sumwhere tht the patch issued isn&#8217;t actually a cure for the remote code execution exploit but is rather simply a detection tool for the exploit so tht IE can identify bugged sites&#8230;&#8230;MS is supposedly still working on a full blown solution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pantagruel</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/12/microsoft-breaks-patch-cycle-to-issue-ie-patch/#comment-125248</link>
		<dc:creator>Pantagruel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1319#comment-125248</guid>
		<description>Regarding the exploits nature (remote code execution) it&#039;s a good thing MS deceided to issue this out of band fix. There is little pr value in keeping it on the shelves just to stick to the &#039;patch tuesday&#039; cycle. 
The only downside is they deceided on releasing a patch after somewhat of a public uproar instead of auto-update distribute it sooner after the exploit was found.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the exploits nature (remote code execution) it&#8217;s a good thing MS deceided to issue this out of band fix. There is little pr value in keeping it on the shelves just to stick to the &#8216;patch tuesday&#8217; cycle.<br />
The only downside is they deceided on releasing a patch after somewhat of a public uproar instead of auto-update distribute it sooner after the exploit was found.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

