<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: onesixtyone 0.3.2 &#8211; An Efficient SNMP Scanner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/onesixtyone-032-an-efficient-snmp-scanner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/onesixtyone-032-an-efficient-snmp-scanner/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/onesixtyone-032-an-efficient-snmp-scanner/#comment-124796</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 07:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1041#comment-124796</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a slighly modified version at:
http://labs.portcullis.co.uk/application/onesixtyone/

It contains a few bugfixes:
* Very large dictionary files supported
* Enhanced error messages
* -w option works correctly to slow down / speed up scans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a slighly modified version at:<br />
<a href="http://labs.portcullis.co.uk/application/onesixtyone/" rel="nofollow">http://labs.portcullis.co.uk/application/onesixtyone/</a></p>
<p>It contains a few bugfixes:<br />
* Very large dictionary files supported<br />
* Enhanced error messages<br />
* -w option works correctly to slow down / speed up scans</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pantagruel</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/onesixtyone-032-an-efficient-snmp-scanner/#comment-124764</link>
		<dc:creator>Pantagruel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1041#comment-124764</guid>
		<description>Looks nice.


MMM compile gives a:
onesixtyone.c:336: warning: conflicting types for built-in function </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks nice.</p>
<p>MMM compile gives a:<br />
onesixtyone.c:336: warning: conflicting types for built-in function</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/09/onesixtyone-032-an-efficient-snmp-scanner/#comment-124763</link>
		<dc:creator>John Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/?p=1041#comment-124763</guid>
		<description>I wrote an article about Cisco SNMP insecurities a while ago. This could be a very useful tool.

http://www.johnlpreston.co.uk/default-cisco-snmp-secure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote an article about Cisco SNMP insecurities a while ago. This could be a very useful tool.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.johnlpreston.co.uk/default-cisco-snmp-secure" rel="nofollow">http://www.johnlpreston.co.uk/default-cisco-snmp-secure</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

