<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wireshark v1.0.0 Released &#8211; Cross Platform Graphical Packet Sniffer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fever</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122679</link>
		<dc:creator>fever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122679</guid>
		<description>i haven&#039;t used this but i used ethereal before it became wireshark. if it is even have as nice as ethereal than i will definitly upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i haven&#8217;t used this but i used ethereal before it became wireshark. if it is even have as nice as ethereal than i will definitly upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mumble</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122593</link>
		<dc:creator>mumble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122593</guid>
		<description>All joking aside - I also like net2pcap (http://www.secdev.org/projects/net2pcap/) - which is essentially a wire -&gt; file tool. Do the analysis offline later using anything. Works great w/ wireshark or just about any other packet analysis tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All joking aside &#8211; I also like net2pcap (<a href="http://www.secdev.org/projects/net2pcap/" rel="nofollow">http://www.secdev.org/projects/net2pcap/</a>) &#8211; which is essentially a wire -&gt; file tool. Do the analysis offline later using anything. Works great w/ wireshark or just about any other packet analysis tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodpeople</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122590</link>
		<dc:creator>goodpeople</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 07:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122590</guid>
		<description>Depends on what I&#039;m trying to find out. WS is kind of a big gun if I only want to analyze MSN traffic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends on what I&#8217;m trying to find out. WS is kind of a big gun if I only want to analyze MSN traffic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James C</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122584</link>
		<dc:creator>James C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122584</guid>
		<description>@mumble  
A list of other sniffer&#039;s, those crazy not wireshark using people might be using 
http://www.tech-faq.com/packet-sniffer.shtml
Personal I use Wireshark for most work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mumble<br />
A list of other sniffer&#8217;s, those crazy not wireshark using people might be using<br />
<a href="http://www.tech-faq.com/packet-sniffer.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.tech-faq.com/packet-sniffer.shtml</a><br />
Personal I use Wireshark for most work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZaD MoFo</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122581</link>
		<dc:creator>ZaD MoFo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122581</guid>
		<description>Wireshark - Such a good dog in this ocean of malware!

Help me keep rodents out of my sanctuary.

Barking @ who I doesn&#039;t know.
Biting thru filtering @ trange behavior packets.
It&#039;s the &quot;Great White&quot; of packet analysis...

Free, easy, predictable: This is what I mean an excellent SoftTool.

Before Wireshark I was in the Darkness...
And as I recall, it is here, on darknet.org.uk that I learned of its existence.

Just my pinch of salt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wireshark &#8211; Such a good dog in this ocean of malware!</p>
<p>Help me keep rodents out of my sanctuary.</p>
<p>Barking @ who I doesn&#8217;t know.<br />
Biting thru filtering @ trange behavior packets.<br />
It&#8217;s the &#8220;Great White&#8221; of packet analysis&#8230;</p>
<p>Free, easy, predictable: This is what I mean an excellent SoftTool.</p>
<p>Before Wireshark I was in the Darkness&#8230;<br />
And as I recall, it is here, on darknet.org.uk that I learned of its existence.</p>
<p>Just my pinch of salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pantagruel</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122577</link>
		<dc:creator>Pantagruel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122577</guid>
		<description>[quote]
This is one tool EVERYONE involved in security or network administration should be familiar with.
[/quote]

nothing more to add, this is one of the basic gpl tools you should be able to use. I can&#039;t think of anything else with this kind of &#039;power&#039; regarding network recon/analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote]<br />
This is one tool EVERYONE involved in security or network administration should be familiar with.<br />
[/quote]</p>
<p>nothing more to add, this is one of the basic gpl tools you should be able to use. I can&#8217;t think of anything else with this kind of &#8216;power&#8217; regarding network recon/analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mumble</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122576</link>
		<dc:creator>mumble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 06:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/04/wireshark-v100-released-cross-platform-graphical-packet-sniffer/#comment-122576</guid>
		<description>Is anyone _not_ using Wireshark? It&#039;s used in the security class I&#039;m taking. I&#039;ve used it at work for years, and even contributed patches. I&#039;m just curious -- if anyone&#039;s not using it, what are they using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone _not_ using Wireshark? It&#8217;s used in the security class I&#8217;m taking. I&#8217;ve used it at work for years, and even contributed patches. I&#8217;m just curious &#8212; if anyone&#8217;s not using it, what are they using?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

