<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perl.com Sends Visitors to Porn Site!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eM3rC</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-110063</link>
		<dc:creator>eM3rC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 02:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-110063</guid>
		<description>I would say IE is the most vulnerable to almost every attack. With firefox you can download an addon called noscript which blocks attacks like this and if you are equipped with a good firewall it should catch the download and/or attempt to install this program. Although I dont know about this exploit personally it seems like IE would be the one affected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say IE is the most vulnerable to almost every attack. With firefox you can download an addon called noscript which blocks attacks like this and if you are equipped with a good firewall it should catch the download and/or attempt to install this program. Although I dont know about this exploit personally it seems like IE would be the one affected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Lion</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-110026</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Lion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-110026</guid>
		<description>The example was Internet Explorer (IE) - but was it truly limited to IE or was Firefox vulnerable as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The example was Internet Explorer (IE) &#8211; but was it truly limited to IE or was Firefox vulnerable as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eM3rC</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-108162</link>
		<dc:creator>eM3rC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-108162</guid>
		<description>Black hats strike again. Seems like a pretty funny prank to pull considering the volume of people that visit perl.com.

I think mozilla should be the new default browser!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black hats strike again. Seems like a pretty funny prank to pull considering the volume of people that visit perl.com.</p>
<p>I think mozilla should be the new default browser!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody_Holme</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-101302</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody_Holme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-101302</guid>
		<description>*points at the tutorial on that somewhere on here* at least, i&#039;m pretty sure it was on here... bad guys can read this too...
I just ignore anything that tries to force me onto exploder... its in my permanent firewall block list just to make sure. So far (and i&#039;ve been doing so for a couple of years now) i think the only site i&#039;ve cared about was some corporate recruitment company who i&#039;ve since found are incompetent in every way anyway, so no loss there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*points at the tutorial on that somewhere on here* at least, i&#8217;m pretty sure it was on here&#8230; bad guys can read this too&#8230;<br />
I just ignore anything that tries to force me onto exploder&#8230; its in my permanent firewall block list just to make sure. So far (and i&#8217;ve been doing so for a couple of years now) i think the only site i&#8217;ve cared about was some corporate recruitment company who i&#8217;ve since found are incompetent in every way anyway, so no loss there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodpeople</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-100958</link>
		<dc:creator>goodpeople</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-100958</guid>
		<description>oh dear.. how sad.. never mind.

This is just plain stupid. But hey, shit happens. I wonder though how the bad guys got hold of the domain name..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh dear.. how sad.. never mind.</p>
<p>This is just plain stupid. But hey, shit happens. I wonder though how the bad guys got hold of the domain name..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reticent</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-100953</link>
		<dc:creator>Reticent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-100953</guid>
		<description>&quot;a life sentence of lynx&quot; - That&#039;s pretty cold, I wouldnt wish that upon anyone :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a life sentence of lynx&#8221; &#8211; That&#8217;s pretty cold, I wouldnt wish that upon anyone <img src='http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pantagruel</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-100809</link>
		<dc:creator>Pantagruel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-100809</guid>
		<description>Guess someone found a &#039;creative&#039; way to plug a whole for the needy Perl geeks ;). And indeed their way of finding a sexy url/domain name surely will have fooled some of the geeks until they where confronted with the scantly clad men/women.
Restricting websites to IE surfers only should be made punishable (a life sentence of lynx usage would be appropriate), it&#039;s shortsighted, extremely annoying and does no justice to your programming/coding skill. Further more I cannot understand why an O&#039;Reilly website would rely on 3rd party sourced Javascripts, you are effectively creating a point of entry/abuse/etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess someone found a &#8216;creative&#8217; way to plug a whole for the needy Perl geeks <img src='http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . And indeed their way of finding a sexy url/domain name surely will have fooled some of the geeks until they where confronted with the scantly clad men/women.<br />
Restricting websites to IE surfers only should be made punishable (a life sentence of lynx usage would be appropriate), it&#8217;s shortsighted, extremely annoying and does no justice to your programming/coding skill. Further more I cannot understand why an O&#8217;Reilly website would rely on 3rd party sourced Javascripts, you are effectively creating a point of entry/abuse/etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-100773</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2008/01/perlcom-sends-visitors-to-porn-site/#comment-100773</guid>
		<description>Indeed, the first thing I noticed was the mention of IE.  I just do not understand why people still use IE.  Then again, my soon-to-be previous employer builds applications that only run in IE, thus securing their insecurity.  Digression noted, I do find their lexicon of geek to be impressive for the sake of domain naming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, the first thing I noticed was the mention of IE.  I just do not understand why people still use IE.  Then again, my soon-to-be previous employer builds applications that only run in IE, thus securing their insecurity.  Digression noted, I do find their lexicon of geek to be impressive for the sake of domain naming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
