Or just go to DC and leave chopsticks cryptically lying around the Pentalawn 2000, in “shapes that could be code”, as if you were Jung throwing a yarrow stick consult from beneath a Bodhi tree.

Or just astrally-project into the War Room and act like you worked there all along.

At now you find papers written mainly by our researcher Doz, who took the time to write and explain in a very easy way each topic covered in the areas. That is you find 2-3 papers for each area written by us.

The size and nature of the kit (only available for download at now) forced us to make a selection of only the most intersting and educational tools and papers (you may find even 10 tools/papers) for area. You’re right it scracthes the surface, but it scratches it very well

I will be discussing with doz if making 1 paper freely available online as a “trial” and I will let you know.

After reviewing your site in much more detail, it is clear that there is a good amount of useful information for beginners. That’s what I get for knee-jerk reactions and posting in the wee small hours.
To quote from an older network, “Open mouth, insert foot, echo internationally.”

That said, I would still like to see a sample of the premium content from your Hackers Kit and some idea of how much is premium content vs. open source content.

Ethics IS a grey area. One persons ethical is anothers unethical.

Like I said before, if the paid-for content of your Hackers Kit is merely the unpublished copyright content, then I would suggest that providing a sample of said content on your site might be a good idea so that people know what they are paying for.
I will be interested to learn what software you bundle. I would also be interested to learn what percentage of content is your own copyright content.

I apologise if I came across as aggresive in my previous post (or this one) I am trying to ascertain if this would be a product I would recommend to the people I have asking me about the best way to learn about IT security.

First of all, I can send you the reconaissance letters for responsible disclosure by Microsoft, Amazon and so on. So this is called *responsible disclosure* that is something very ethical in my opinion.

And if you say our advisories are vague, then my friend, you talk about being ethical but you should know what you can say in an advisory and what not. We have never shown unpatched exploits. Once again *responsible disclosure*.

Here you demonstrate you’re confused:
“a serious hacker working with buffer overflows MUST know assembly”
but later:
“As you say, your pack is for beginners and I’m sure that there is much useful information and many useful applications to assist a beginner who wants to learn about hacking”

Yes, Our kit is for beginners and average hackers as you can read from the very home page of the kit itself. No need to complain about assembly to be missing, since you understood yourself it is for beginners.

And I’m very disappointed that in the security professionals field there still a misconception of the word ethical.

Ethical is the way you use your information not the information itself.
But in order to be a good ethical hacker you need to have to learn black hat techinques and master black hat tools, in my opinion.

The IT Security field suffers from such misconception. This is the main cause why ethical hackers fail to do their job properly and black hat are still there to waste ethical hackers efforts.
I think both should learn the same things, but behave differently.

For what concerns the tools, they are free, no warez in it, a couple of them maybe trial. You’re paying for our unpublished content and our work to put them in 1 pack.

I hope I was clear enough, this is not a fight TheRealDonQuixote, but I have to defend and explain years of hard work on my site from random people saying it has no information. Ridiculous

Forgot to say that of course most of the tools are gnu software. (the best port scanners, sniffers, packet manipulators, and so on).

Once again we are not charging any money from them, we charge money for our unpublished and copyrighted contents and our work on creating an educational path to speed up the learning process.

I currently don’t have the full listing of the files, I will try to publish one asap.

I just thought that little quote might help put everything into perspective. Including the China hax the Pentagon article.

I appreciate that you are in the business of making money but it would be easier to take you seriously, and may increase your sales, if you included some sample whitepapers from HSC.

As you say, your pack is for beginners and I’m sure that there is much useful information and many useful applications to assist a beginner who wants to learn about hacking. The issue I have is wether your pack will teach ethical hacking.

It’s not for me, but, and this might be seen as big-headed of me, I do not consider myself to be a beginner.

Let me clarify your doubts.

Our kit is meant to speed up your learning process (if you want/need to learn it of course) of ethical hacking. It contains a lot of *unpublished* papers along with a selection of the best tools.

The contents are divided into main areas

For each areas you have the best selected papers + unpublished papers written by HSC Security group. If you don’t know us just make a search on google. We found holes into Microsoft, eBay, Amazon and so on.

Along with the papers you have tools and source codes for that area. So, learn the theory and do practice.

Of course you can browse the web and get random tools or papers but the kit saves you a lot of time, gives you access to unpublished contents and makes your learning process more efficient and faster because it is built from an educational point of view.

The kit is 1Gb and downloadable into 4 parts for your convenience.

At first we created this kit, as a gift for the attendants of our hacking courses and conferences. Its success and demand invited us to make it public.

Darknet will post an unbiased review on the kit soon, he has access to a free copy of the kit just for this purpose
And if he decided to include it among the prizes I’m sure he liked it.