Vista Security Claims Debunked – Figures Skewed

Your website & network are Hackable


Ah more news about the insecurity of Vista and something we are all pretty aware of…the skewing of figures by Microsoft.

Microsoft apparently still hasn’t learned that counting vulnerabilities doesn’t establish some kind of ‘security level’.

You can read the report here:

Vista 6 Month Vuln Report [PDF]

The Microsoft “researcher” claims that Windows Vista is exponentially less vulnerable than many Linux distributions and Mac OS X. It may be true that the default Vista installation has had less public vulnerability reports, and that Linux has had many more, but this is due to the nature of Open Source. Jeff does not include any “silently fixed” vulnerabilities that have been patched since Vista was released and Microsoft has not disclosed such vulnerabilities publicly.

The methodology used was deeply flawed, as I briefly mentioned before, bugs in Firefox and other software like emacs count as a flaw for Linux whilst IE bugs get ignored for Vista.

The conclusions that are drawn are built on a lack of understanding by the Microsoft researcher. I highly encourage him to go back and take another look, and pare down the results to essential information that is absolutely critical to the conclusions, rather than just “Other OS’s have more bugs, see, look at my graphs”…

Good PR, but bad research? Seems par for the course.

And perhaps it could backfire PR wise, as the clued in people get pushed further away from Vista.

Source: Full Disclosure


Posted in: Exploits/Vulnerabilities, Windows Hacking

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Recent in Exploits/Vulnerabilities:
- Intel Hidden Management Engine – x86 Security Risk?
- TeamViewer Hacked? It Certainly Looks Like It
- Serious ImageMagick Zero-Day Vulnerabilities – ImageTragick?

Related Posts:

Most Read in Exploits/Vulnerabilities:
- Learn to use Metasploit – Tutorials, Docs & Videos - 234,749 views
- AJAX: Is your application secure enough? - 120,100 views
- eEye Launches 0-Day Exploit Tracker - 85,537 views

Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit Premium | 1 Year 1 PC for $24.95


6 Responses to Vista Security Claims Debunked – Figures Skewed

  1. Nobody_Holme August 21, 2007 at 12:09 pm #
  2. TheRealDonQuixote August 21, 2007 at 9:16 pm #

    Man I hate Microsoft. If thier OS’s weren’t so easy to hack, and the mere fact that so many people use them, I’d never bother with it at all.

  3. Mitchel Ashley August 22, 2007 at 12:14 am #

    It has been our experience and the experience of our SAT team here are Stillsecure that Vista is the most secure OS ever made.

    Combine that with some security tools like SafeAccess and you have a nearly inpenatrable computing fortress.

  4. Michael Ajitsingh August 26, 2007 at 5:28 am #

    Those who use MS Windows are the same people who’d walk down Baghdad with a sign on their back saying “Hi, I’m an American.”

  5. Daniel August 30, 2007 at 3:29 am #

    hmmm oh well. security is still totally Dependant on the user.

  6. Sandeep Nain August 31, 2007 at 2:09 am #

    Well how about telling micro$oft that we agree with whatever microsoft says… I hope this will stop them from bugging us with their fake reports..