<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista more secure than Mac OSX and Linux?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: codey</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-150584</link>
		<dc:creator>codey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 17:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-150584</guid>
		<description>Thats sad that microsoft thinks there more secure than  any other os out there . When they are the most targeted and most used operating system. plus how can he count firefox bug in linux and not ie bugs in vista .  something is just not right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats sad that microsoft thinks there more secure than  any other os out there . When they are the most targeted and most used operating system. plus how can he count firefox bug in linux and not ie bugs in vista .  something is just not right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-124034</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-124034</guid>
		<description>I dont think vista is more secure than other distros. Meta exploits can still attack it. And soon as you install firefox with ie you are vunerable.

More so, numbers can me moulded. I agree with this statment. At our work, we sell clients a vista computer. However, it comes with downgrade XP cd&#039;s. We use these to remove vista and install XP on it. However, microsoft count it as a vista sale. silly hey?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think vista is more secure than other distros. Meta exploits can still attack it. And soon as you install firefox with ie you are vunerable.</p>
<p>More so, numbers can me moulded. I agree with this statment. At our work, we sell clients a vista computer. However, it comes with downgrade XP cd&#8217;s. We use these to remove vista and install XP on it. However, microsoft count it as a vista sale. silly hey?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep Nain</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-63411</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep Nain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 02:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-63411</guid>
		<description>Well I find this integer adding captcha is better than those image ones.. it sometimes is really hard understand the letters in the image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I find this integer adding captcha is better than those image ones.. it sometimes is really hard understand the letters in the image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheRealDonQuixote</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62487</link>
		<dc:creator>TheRealDonQuixote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62487</guid>
		<description>I have a &quot;spam catching&quot; app/service on my wordpress blog and it sometimes throws out the baby with the bath water.  I wish I could have the adding &quot;captcha&quot; thingy.  Akismet catches almost all the spam, AND I lose some real comments too.  However, its free and I can&#039;t afford my own hosting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a &#8220;spam catching&#8221; app/service on my wordpress blog and it sometimes throws out the baby with the bath water.  I wish I could have the adding &#8220;captcha&#8221; thingy.  Akismet catches almost all the spam, AND I lose some real comments too.  However, its free and I can&#8217;t afford my own hosting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody_Holme</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62477</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody_Holme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 12:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62477</guid>
		<description>ARGH! tried to agree that it catches me sometimes and what do I do? :&#039;( @ my maths skillz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARGH! tried to agree that it catches me sometimes and what do I do? :&#8217;( @ my maths skillz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darknet</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62465</link>
		<dc:creator>Darknet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62465</guid>
		<description>Yeah always copy to the clipboard, sorry about that guys but without extra measures the spam is over-whelming and I always lose real comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah always copy to the clipboard, sorry about that guys but without extra measures the spam is over-whelming and I always lose real comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheRealDonQuixote</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62454</link>
		<dc:creator>TheRealDonQuixote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62454</guid>
		<description>@Daniel - I got caught with the &quot;Please add # and #&quot; thing enough times that I always copy all my text before submitting, just in case I waited too long and it gets zapped.  That way I can paste the text into another comment if it gets lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel &#8211; I got caught with the &#8220;Please add # and #&#8221; thing enough times that I always copy all my text before submitting, just in case I waited too long and it gets zapped.  That way I can paste the text into another comment if it gets lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62436</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62436</guid>
		<description>Even as a user of VISTA on one of my computers, I think this is pretty much just marketing talk. Of course, the fact the VISTA isn&#039;t exactly popular and doesn&#039;t have a huge market penetration yet isn&#039;t mentioned. I&#039;m sure that there will be plenty of bugs / attacks on VISTA as it is used more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even as a user of VISTA on one of my computers, I think this is pretty much just marketing talk. Of course, the fact the VISTA isn&#8217;t exactly popular and doesn&#8217;t have a huge market penetration yet isn&#8217;t mentioned. I&#8217;m sure that there will be plenty of bugs / attacks on VISTA as it is used more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62432</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62432</guid>
		<description>AAAAHHHH I HATE THAT ADDING CAPTCHA!!! I WROTE A HUGE POST AND I CANT ADD!!!!!

oh well sorry to yell&#039; ill write it again later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AAAAHHHH I HATE THAT ADDING CAPTCHA!!! I WROTE A HUGE POST AND I CANT ADD!!!!!</p>
<p>oh well sorry to yell&#8217; ill write it again later</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheRealDonQuixote</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62263</link>
		<dc:creator>TheRealDonQuixote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 07:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/vista-more-secure-than-mac-osx-and-linux/#comment-62263</guid>
		<description>Sandeep: I use Kubuntu right now cause I need the pure KDE desktop to match BackTrack.  So far Guard Dog is the best balance of control and ease of use for a firewall.  KlamAV + ClamAV works well enough for viri.  As for spyware and other assorted malware I&#039;m stuck with the CLI and manual scans with CHrootkit.

That&#039;s not too bad for a burgeoning system.  Also I run TORk when I feel like being all stealthy.  Still, I&#039;ll probably go back to Slax and backtrack when I&#039;m done with my current project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandeep: I use Kubuntu right now cause I need the pure KDE desktop to match BackTrack.  So far Guard Dog is the best balance of control and ease of use for a firewall.  KlamAV + ClamAV works well enough for viri.  As for spyware and other assorted malware I&#8217;m stuck with the CLI and manual scans with CHrootkit.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not too bad for a burgeoning system.  Also I run TORk when I feel like being all stealthy.  Still, I&#8217;ll probably go back to Slax and backtrack when I&#8217;m done with my current project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

