<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LLDP &#8211; Link Layer Discovery Protocol Fuzzer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/lldp-link-layer-discovery-protocol-fuzzer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/lldp-link-layer-discovery-protocol-fuzzer/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:15:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep Nain</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/lldp-link-layer-discovery-protocol-fuzzer/#comment-62282</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep Nain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/lldp-link-layer-discovery-protocol-fuzzer/#comment-62282</guid>
		<description>Yeah but these protocols could have been designed in a better way... I mean atleast packet authentication was something which shuld hv been taken care of...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah but these protocols could have been designed in a better way&#8230; I mean atleast packet authentication was something which shuld hv been taken care of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheRealDonQuixote</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/lldp-link-layer-discovery-protocol-fuzzer/#comment-62265</link>
		<dc:creator>TheRealDonQuixote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 07:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/lldp-link-layer-discovery-protocol-fuzzer/#comment-62265</guid>
		<description>However, I guess its sort of a necessary evil though if you are trying to track inventory like with cysco or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, I guess its sort of a necessary evil though if you are trying to track inventory like with cysco or whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep Nain</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/lldp-link-layer-discovery-protocol-fuzzer/#comment-62254</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep Nain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 06:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/lldp-link-layer-discovery-protocol-fuzzer/#comment-62254</guid>
		<description>also NDP...
U r right TRDQ, LLDP doesnt authenticate the packets.. which is not very smart...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also NDP&#8230;<br />
U r right TRDQ, LLDP doesnt authenticate the packets.. which is not very smart&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2007.08.08 Daily Security Reading &#171; Rodney Campbell&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/lldp-link-layer-discovery-protocol-fuzzer/#comment-62163</link>
		<dc:creator>2007.08.08 Daily Security Reading &#171; Rodney Campbell&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/lldp-link-layer-discovery-protocol-fuzzer/#comment-62163</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted by Rodney.Campbell at August 8th, 2007   LLDP - Link Layer Discovery Protocol Fuzzer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted by Rodney.Campbell at August 8th, 2007   LLDP &#8211; Link Layer Discovery Protocol Fuzzer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheRealDonQuixote</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/lldp-link-layer-discovery-protocol-fuzzer/#comment-61945</link>
		<dc:creator>TheRealDonQuixote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 07:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/08/lldp-link-layer-discovery-protocol-fuzzer/#comment-61945</guid>
		<description>Discovery Protocols are so silly.  LLDP, and its proprietary sisters CDP and EDP, are all vulnerable by design.  Now we have this great fuzzer to gather even more information on our target?!?!  SWEET!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discovery Protocols are so silly.  LLDP, and its proprietary sisters CDP and EDP, are all vulnerable by design.  Now we have this great fuzzer to gather even more information on our target?!?!  SWEET!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
