<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phrack 64 Released &#8211; It&#8217;s been a long time..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/phrack-64-released-its-been-a-long-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/phrack-64-released-its-been-a-long-time/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: phrack 64</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/phrack-64-released-its-been-a-long-time/#comment-60191</link>
		<dc:creator>phrack 64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 20:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/phrack-64-released-its-been-a-long-time/#comment-60191</guid>
		<description>[...] lo visto phrack no solamente vuelve a sacar un nuevo número, si no que intentan volver a su espiritu underground original. Lo que no entiendo es por que volver [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lo visto phrack no solamente vuelve a sacar un nuevo número, si no que intentan volver a su espiritu underground original. Lo que no entiendo es por que volver [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
