<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government Accountability Office Report Slams FBI Internal Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/government-accountability-office-report-slams-fbi-internal-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/government-accountability-office-report-slams-fbi-internal-security/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep Nain</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/government-accountability-office-report-slams-fbi-internal-security/#comment-60584</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep Nain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/government-accountability-office-report-slams-fbi-internal-security/#comment-60584</guid>
		<description>Well i am sure their budget does have a huge amount sanctioned for IT Security.. and that money must have been shown used too...

is it just me who is thinking that... management over their is just assuming that their infrastructure is secure and putting the money in their bank accounts instead...

sounds like corruption to me and not just the IT (in)security</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i am sure their budget does have a huge amount sanctioned for IT Security.. and that money must have been shown used too&#8230;</p>
<p>is it just me who is thinking that&#8230; management over their is just assuming that their infrastructure is secure and putting the money in their bank accounts instead&#8230;</p>
<p>sounds like corruption to me and not just the IT (in)security</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pentagon E-mail System HACKED &#124; Darknet - The Darkside</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/government-accountability-office-report-slams-fbi-internal-security/#comment-60530</link>
		<dc:creator>Pentagon E-mail System HACKED &#124; Darknet - The Darkside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/government-accountability-office-report-slams-fbi-internal-security/#comment-60530</guid>
		<description>[...] This comes shortly after the GAO (Government Accountability Office) report slamming FBI Internal Security. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This comes shortly after the GAO (Government Accountability Office) report slamming FBI Internal Security. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bogwitch</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/government-accountability-office-report-slams-fbi-internal-security/#comment-59786</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogwitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/government-accountability-office-report-slams-fbi-internal-security/#comment-59786</guid>
		<description>The article paints an all-too-familiar story - IT and security departments taking the blame for a lack of funding.
I have no doubt that agencies like the FBI rely too heavily on staff vetting which, unfortunately, is &lt;a HREF="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,236105,00.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;not completely reliable.&lt;/A&gt; Just because someone has passed a background check, does not always mean they are trustworthy....
However, the biggest problem is convincing any organisation that investment in information security is worthwhile. It is very difficult to convince organisations to perceive that there is a &lt;a HREF="http://securitysolutions.com/mag/security_calculating_roi_data_security/" rel="nofollow"&gt;return on investment&lt;/A&gt; let alone to attempt to calculate that return.
Until this happens, IT departments and information security departments will always take the blame for poor security management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article paints an all-too-familiar story - IT and security departments taking the blame for a lack of funding.<br />
I have no doubt that agencies like the FBI rely too heavily on staff vetting which, unfortunately, is <a HREF="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,236105,00.html" rel="nofollow">not completely reliable.</a> Just because someone has passed a background check, does not always mean they are trustworthy&#8230;.<br />
However, the biggest problem is convincing any organisation that investment in information security is worthwhile. It is very difficult to convince organisations to perceive that there is a <a HREF="http://securitysolutions.com/mag/security_calculating_roi_data_security/" rel="nofollow">return on investment</a> let alone to attempt to calculate that return.<br />
Until this happens, IT departments and information security departments will always take the blame for poor security management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred Farrington</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/government-accountability-office-report-slams-fbi-internal-security/#comment-59768</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred Farrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/06/government-accountability-office-report-slams-fbi-internal-security/#comment-59768</guid>
		<description>Hmmm seems like they are spending alot of money and still can't get it right. Seems like our same good ol government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm seems like they are spending alot of money and still can&#8217;t get it right. Seems like our same good ol government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
