<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consulting Licence Offer From Redseal &#8211; Security Risk Manager (SRM)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/05/consulting-licence-offer-from-redseal-security-risk-manager-srm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/05/consulting-licence-offer-from-redseal-security-risk-manager-srm/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Risk Has Got To Have Probability Based on Frequency &#124; RiskAnalys.is</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/05/consulting-licence-offer-from-redseal-security-risk-manager-srm/#comment-58642</link>
		<dc:creator>Risk Has Got To Have Probability Based on Frequency &#124; RiskAnalys.is</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 16:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2007/05/consulting-licence-offer-from-redseal-security-risk-manager-srm/#comment-58642</guid>
		<description>[...] There are some really cool products that are mislabeled as &#8220;risk management&#8221; products.  This mislabeling is one of the factors that cause smart folks (Jaquith and Ranum among them) to claim that &#8220;risk management&#8221; is dying or dead.  Rothman said last week to me that people are becoming &#8220;numb&#8221; to the term.   DarkNet talks about one such product today.  Now the vendor of this product has some really cool stuff, and very respected people I know utilize their technology to feed priors into FAIR.  but it&#8217;s worth repeating: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are some really cool products that are mislabeled as &#8220;risk management&#8221; products.  This mislabeling is one of the factors that cause smart folks (Jaquith and Ranum among them) to claim that &#8220;risk management&#8221; is dying or dead.  Rothman said last week to me that people are becoming &#8220;numb&#8221; to the term.   DarkNet talks about one such product today.  Now the vendor of this product has some really cool stuff, and very respected people I know utilize their technology to feed priors into FAIR.  but it&#8217;s worth repeating: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

