<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hacking Tor &#8211; A Flaw Appears?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: navin</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-125381</link>
		<dc:creator>navin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-125381</guid>
		<description>I agree chris, but fact of the matter is tht most users do use privoxy for Tor and don&#039;t really have the technical knowhow on how to set up a personal box...... tht leaves them in a state where their online security can be compromised</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree chris, but fact of the matter is tht most users do use privoxy for Tor and don&#8217;t really have the technical knowhow on how to set up a personal box&#8230;&#8230; tht leaves them in a state where their online security can be compromised</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-125372</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-125372</guid>
		<description>The problem with this paper is that they expect that the user is only using something like Privoxy for Tor. What if the user is default-routing all his TCP traffic through his own Tor proxy box? The method he uses for demasking won&#039;t work because all the TCP traffic is being routed through Tor anyway.

I don&#039;t see anything groundbreaking about this paper and his methods are easily defeated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with this paper is that they expect that the user is only using something like Privoxy for Tor. What if the user is default-routing all his TCP traffic through his own Tor proxy box? The method he uses for demasking won&#8217;t work because all the TCP traffic is being routed through Tor anyway.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see anything groundbreaking about this paper and his methods are easily defeated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethernode</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-35465</link>
		<dc:creator>ethernode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-35465</guid>
		<description>I was talking about the packetstormsecurity.org implications, not about the flaw itself. Following what i understood from the article, that would mean that tor&#039;s anonymity features are fake (because of the &quot;sent back via DNS tunnel to an external host to confirm the real identity of the host&quot;) ? I&#039;m beginning to guess i&#039;m saying shit, but doesn&#039;t this back-tunnel outpass the 1-hop only feature?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was talking about the packetstormsecurity.org implications, not about the flaw itself. Following what i understood from the article, that would mean that tor&#8217;s anonymity features are fake (because of the &#8220;sent back via DNS tunnel to an external host to confirm the real identity of the host&#8221;) ? I&#8217;m beginning to guess i&#8217;m saying shit, but doesn&#8217;t this back-tunnel outpass the 1-hop only feature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darknet</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-35463</link>
		<dc:creator>Darknet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-35463</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Brian:&lt;/strong&gt; Yah I guess it would, anything as such can circumvent the anonymity of a proxy, that&#039;s why using something like AnonymOS is preferable.

&lt;strong&gt;gerg:&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks I&#039;ll check that out.

&lt;strong&gt;ethernode:&lt;/strong&gt; I don&#039;t think so this a flaw in any proxy based system, it&#039;s just showing how its relevant to Tor aswell. It&#039;s still the best system there is ATM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Brian:</strong> Yah I guess it would, anything as such can circumvent the anonymity of a proxy, that&#8217;s why using something like AnonymOS is preferable.</p>
<p><strong>gerg:</strong> Thanks I&#8217;ll check that out.</p>
<p><strong>ethernode:</strong> I don&#8217;t think so this a flaw in any proxy based system, it&#8217;s just showing how its relevant to Tor aswell. It&#8217;s still the best system there is ATM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ethernode</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-35423</link>
		<dc:creator>ethernode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-35423</guid>
		<description>So, if the SANS is serious about this, is tor a giant honeypot? Corporate or occult?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if the SANS is serious about this, is tor a giant honeypot? Corporate or occult?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerg</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-34852</link>
		<dc:creator>gerg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 00:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-34852</guid>
		<description>This so called paper only describe methods that are known for more than 10 years and that work with every proxy...
There&#039;s no Tor specific flaws in this document.

The paper title is just a way to make lamers talk and provide &quot;instant celebrity&quot; to his author... nothing new here

If you want some real technical paper on Tor search a pdf document on how to discover the location of an hidden service using statistics based on rendez-vous nodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This so called paper only describe methods that are known for more than 10 years and that work with every proxy&#8230;<br />
There&#8217;s no Tor specific flaws in this document.</p>
<p>The paper title is just a way to make lamers talk and provide &#8220;instant celebrity&#8221; to his author&#8230; nothing new here</p>
<p>If you want some real technical paper on Tor search a pdf document on how to discover the location of an hidden service using statistics based on rendez-vous nodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-34823</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/11/hacking-tor-a-flaw-appears/#comment-34823</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post, I use tor pretty extensively myself and I have to say this is troubleing. The only thing is wouldn&#039;t this &quot;vulnerability&quot; fall into the same category as the already known ActiveX and Flash vulnerabilities for these plugin&#039;s requiring a direct connection with the client and thus circumventing the proxy network?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post, I use tor pretty extensively myself and I have to say this is troubleing. The only thing is wouldn&#8217;t this &#8220;vulnerability&#8221; fall into the same category as the already known ActiveX and Flash vulnerabilities for these plugin&#8217;s requiring a direct connection with the client and thus circumventing the proxy network?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
