It seems like war-driving may become a thing of the past, legislation is starting to happen.
It’s a good start though, you have to target the manufacturers to educate their users, not target the users as they don’t care, sometimes ease of use has to be traded a bit with security.
California legislators have passed a law which will force makers of wireless internet equipment to include guidance on keeping data secure on wireless connections. The law now awaits signature by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
From 1 October 2007, manufacturers must place warning labels on all equipment capable of receiving Wi-Fi signals, according to the new state law. These can take the form of box stickers, special notification in setup software, notification during the router setup, or through automatic securing of the connection. One warning sticker must be positioned so that it must be removed by a consumer before the product can be used.
The warnings would have to contain information on how to secure files, folders, and connections. Wireless internet connections can be used by anyone with Wi-Fi capability within the range of the transmitter unless they are secured.
Makes sense really right? The current law in a way can be seen to cover unauthorised wireless use.
The legislation acknowledges disagreement in the US as to whether it is legal for someone to use another person’s unprotected Wi-Fi connection. “While Section 502 of the Penal Code prohibits the unauthorized access to computers, computer systems, and computer data, authorized use is determined by the specific circumstances of the access,” it states. “There are also federal laws, including the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act [...]that prohibit the intentional access to a computer without authorisation.”
In UK such warnings are not required but the position of using someone elses wi-fi connection is much clearer.
“The Communications Act includes an offence of dishonestly obtaining an electronic communications service ‘with intent to avoid payment of a charge applicable to the provision of that service’,” said Robertson. “We’ve already seen a conviction in the UK for using someone else’s Wi-Fi connection without authority.”
In July 2005, Gregory Straszkiewicz became the first person to be convicted under this provision. He was fined Â£500 at London’s Islewoth Crown Court. The Act provides for a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a fine.
So, is this the end of war driving?
Source: The Register
Recent in Legal Issues:
- Anonymous Targets Singapore For Proposed Internet Licensing Rules
- PRISM, Edward Snowden, Big Brother & More Stuff We Already Knew
- 4 Former LulzSec Members Sentenced To Prison Time In The UK
- Microsoft Security Assessment Tool – Free for Windows
- Agnitio v2.0 Released – Code Security Review Tool
- Passwords Passe at RSA
Most Read in Legal Issues:
- Class President Hacks School Grades - 80,466 views
- Hospital Hacker GhostExodus Owns Himself – Arrested - 47,370 views
- One Of The World’s Most Prolific Music Piracy Groups Busted - 43,439 views