<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux Kernel 2.6.x PRCTL Core Dump Handling &#8211; Local r00t Exploit ( BID 18874 / CVE-2006-2451 )</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/07/linux-kernel-26x-prctl-core-dump-handling-local-r00t-exploit-bid-18874-cve-2006-2451/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/07/linux-kernel-26x-prctl-core-dump-handling-local-r00t-exploit-bid-18874-cve-2006-2451/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:17:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: darren</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/07/linux-kernel-26x-prctl-core-dump-handling-local-r00t-exploit-bid-18874-cve-2006-2451/#comment-10018</link>
		<dc:creator>darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/07/linux-kernel-26x-prctl-core-dump-handling-local-r00t-exploit-bid-18874-cve-2006-2451/#comment-10018</guid>
		<description>Silahsiz Kuvvetler which one do you use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silahsiz Kuvvetler which one do you use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silahsiz Kuvvetler</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/07/linux-kernel-26x-prctl-core-dump-handling-local-r00t-exploit-bid-18874-cve-2006-2451/#comment-4767</link>
		<dc:creator>Silahsiz Kuvvetler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 01:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/07/linux-kernel-26x-prctl-core-dump-handling-local-r00t-exploit-bid-18874-cve-2006-2451/#comment-4767</guid>
		<description>this exploit is not bad but it is not the best too...but you published the little part of it..it&#039;s not whole</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this exploit is not bad but it is not the best too&#8230;but you published the little part of it..it&#8217;s not whole</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

