<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Defense of Privacy &#8211; Tells Feds to BACK OFF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/googles-defense-of-privacy-tells-feds-to-back-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/googles-defense-of-privacy-tells-feds-to-back-off/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:04:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darknet</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/googles-defense-of-privacy-tells-feds-to-back-off/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Darknet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 03:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/googles-defense-of-privacy-tells-feds-to-back-off/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Navaho:&lt;/strong&gt; Cynical as always my dear friend :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Navaho:</strong> Cynical as always my dear friend <img src='http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navaho Gunleg</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/googles-defense-of-privacy-tells-feds-to-back-off/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Navaho Gunleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/googles-defense-of-privacy-tells-feds-to-back-off/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Darknet&lt;/strong&gt;: Decent info? I think you mis-spelt &#039;targeted ads&#039; there. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Darknet</strong>: Decent info? I think you mis-spelt &#8216;targeted ads&#8217; there. <img src='http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darknet</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/googles-defense-of-privacy-tells-feds-to-back-off/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Darknet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/googles-defense-of-privacy-tells-feds-to-back-off/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;JAM:&lt;/strong&gt; Yah I&#039;d tend to agree with you man, problem with China is that it&#039;s  like the American anti-terrorist policy. You either do what China says or you get the hell out. I think Google are trying to work with the Chinese government so the people can get at least SOME decent info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>JAM:</strong> Yah I&#8217;d tend to agree with you man, problem with China is that it&#8217;s  like the American anti-terrorist policy. You either do what China says or you get the hell out. I think Google are trying to work with the Chinese government so the people can get at least SOME decent info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAM</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/googles-defense-of-privacy-tells-feds-to-back-off/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>JAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/googles-defense-of-privacy-tells-feds-to-back-off/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Hmm. I back Google&#039;s stand on privacy 100% but it seems a little hypocritical considering their stand on privacy in China. They seem to be saying &quot;Hey look we have moral standards ummm unless it comes to making money.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. I back Google&#8217;s stand on privacy 100% but it seems a little hypocritical considering their stand on privacy in China. They seem to be saying &#8220;Hey look we have moral standards ummm unless it comes to making money.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
