<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Desktop Privacy? OR Lack Of..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/google-desktop-privacy-or-lack-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/google-desktop-privacy-or-lack-of/</link>
	<description>Ethical Hacking, Penetration Testing &#38; Computer Security</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Desktop 3 &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/google-desktop-privacy-or-lack-of/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Desktop 3 &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/google-desktop-privacy-or-lack-of/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Enterprise has reacted to privacy concerns and released Google Desktop 3 Enterprise. It responds to security concerns allowing full administrator control, letting them use the standard group policy settings to completely disable features, including the controversial Search Across Computers feature which you can read about in our original article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Enterprise has reacted to privacy concerns and released Google Desktop 3 Enterprise. It responds to security concerns allowing full administrator control, letting them use the standard group policy settings to completely disable features, including the controversial Search Across Computers feature which you can read about in our original article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darknet</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/google-desktop-privacy-or-lack-of/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Darknet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/google-desktop-privacy-or-lack-of/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ben:&lt;/strong&gt; Yah I agree it might be a good feature, but well implemented the wrong way...30 day retention on their servers if you want to use the feature? Not a good idea if you ask me. Yeah you should check out the Google Hacks Database :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ben:</strong> Yah I agree it might be a good feature, but well implemented the wrong way&#8230;30 day retention on their servers if you want to use the feature? Not a good idea if you ask me. Yeah you should check out the Google Hacks Database <img src='http://www.darknet.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/google-desktop-privacy-or-lack-of/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/02/google-desktop-privacy-or-lack-of/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>It truly would be a handy feature to be able to access your documents anywhere in this fashion;  but, the possible security problems would make it quite risky.  Especially considering the recent hack of gmail.  Thanks for pointing this out, might have saved me from having a bunch MORE personal documents searchable on google. 
Try on google search:  filetype:qbb
Dangerous amount of stuff in google already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It truly would be a handy feature to be able to access your documents anywhere in this fashion;  but, the possible security problems would make it quite risky.  Especially considering the recent hack of gmail.  Thanks for pointing this out, might have saved me from having a bunch MORE personal documents searchable on google.<br />
Try on google search:  filetype:qbb<br />
Dangerous amount of stuff in google already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
